On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:37:09AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:

> -	pl022->clk = devm_clk_get(&adev->dev, NULL);
> +	/*
> +	 * For compatibility with old DTBs and platform data, fall back to the
> +	 * first clock if there's not an explicitly named "sspclk" entry.
> +	 */
> +	pl022->clk = devm_clk_get(&adev->dev, "sspclk");
> +	if (IS_ERR(pl022->clk))
> +		pl022->clk = devm_clk_get(&adev->dev, NULL);
> +

I'll just have a bit of a grumble here and point out that this sort of
stuff always worries me with the convention of using nameless clocks -
it causes hassle adding further clocks.

In any case you didn't CC me on the cover letter or any of the non-SPI
patches so I'm not sure what the dependencies are here (if there are
any), does the series need to go in as one?