From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932096AbaBKTdX (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:33:23 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:40375 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754117AbaBKTHw (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:07:52 -0500 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Joe Thornber , Mike Snitzer Subject: [PATCH 3.10 38/79] dm space map common: make sure new space is used during extend Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:05:42 -0800 Message-Id: <20140211184722.043059748@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.5.1.163.gd7aced9 In-Reply-To: <20140211184720.928667275@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20140211184720.928667275@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.61-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Joe Thornber commit 12c91a5c2d2a8e8cc40a9552313e1e7b0a2d9ee3 upstream. When extending a low level space map we should update nr_blocks at the start so the new space is used for the index entries. Otherwise extend can fail, e.g.: sm_metadata_extend call sequence that fails: -> sm_ll_extend -> dm_tm_new_block -> dm_sm_new_block -> sm_bootstrap_new_block => returns -ENOSPC because smm->begin == smm->ll.nr_blocks Signed-off-by: Joe Thornber Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-space-map-common.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-space-map-common.c +++ b/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-space-map-common.c @@ -245,6 +245,10 @@ int sm_ll_extend(struct ll_disk *ll, dm_ return -EINVAL; } + /* + * We need to set this before the dm_tm_new_block() call below. + */ + ll->nr_blocks = nr_blocks; for (i = old_blocks; i < blocks; i++) { struct dm_block *b; struct disk_index_entry idx; @@ -252,6 +256,7 @@ int sm_ll_extend(struct ll_disk *ll, dm_ r = dm_tm_new_block(ll->tm, &dm_sm_bitmap_validator, &b); if (r < 0) return r; + idx.blocknr = cpu_to_le64(dm_block_location(b)); r = dm_tm_unlock(ll->tm, b); @@ -266,7 +271,6 @@ int sm_ll_extend(struct ll_disk *ll, dm_ return r; } - ll->nr_blocks = nr_blocks; return 0; }