From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752905AbaBNIJq (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Feb 2014 03:09:46 -0500 Received: from e28smtp06.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.6]:55993 "EHLO e28smtp06.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752039AbaBNIAM (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Feb 2014 03:00:12 -0500 From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Subject: [PATCH v2 24/52] x86, intel, rapl: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration To: paulus@samba.org, oleg@redhat.com, mingo@kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, tj@kernel.org, walken@google.com, ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Peter Zijlstra , Paul Mackerras , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:24:41 +0530 Message-ID: <20140214075441.22701.79.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20140214074750.22701.47330.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> References: <20140214074750.22701.47330.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> User-Agent: StGIT/0.14.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 14021408-9574-0000-0000-00000BF2FC13 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown below: get_online_cpus(); for_each_online_cpu(cpu) init_cpu(cpu); register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier); put_online_cpus(); This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently with CPU hotplug operations). Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback registration is: cpu_notifier_register_begin(); for_each_online_cpu(cpu) init_cpu(cpu); /* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */ __register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier); cpu_notifier_register_done(); Fix the intel rapl code in x86 by using this latter form of callback registration. Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Paul Mackerras Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: x86@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c index 5ad35ad..059218e 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c @@ -646,19 +646,20 @@ static int __init rapl_pmu_init(void) /* unsupported */ return 0; } - get_online_cpus(); + + cpu_notifier_register_begin(); for_each_online_cpu(cpu) { rapl_cpu_prepare(cpu); rapl_cpu_init(cpu); } - perf_cpu_notifier(rapl_cpu_notifier); + __perf_cpu_notifier(rapl_cpu_notifier); ret = perf_pmu_register(&rapl_pmu_class, "power", -1); if (WARN_ON(ret)) { pr_info("RAPL PMU detected, registration failed (%d), RAPL PMU disabled\n", ret); - put_online_cpus(); + cpu_notifier_register_done(); return -1; } @@ -672,7 +673,7 @@ static int __init rapl_pmu_init(void) hweight32(rapl_cntr_mask), ktime_to_ms(pmu->timer_interval)); - put_online_cpus(); + cpu_notifier_register_done(); return 0; } From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Subject: [PATCH v2 24/52] x86, intel, rapl: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:24:41 +0530 Message-ID: <20140214075441.22701.79.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> References: <20140214074750.22701.47330.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from e28smtp06.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.6]:55992 "EHLO e28smtp06.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751139AbaBNIAM (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Feb 2014 03:00:12 -0500 Received: from /spool/local by e28smtp06.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:30:10 +0530 In-Reply-To: <20140214074750.22701.47330.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: oleg@redhat.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, peterz@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, tj@kernel.org, walken@google.com, ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Peter Zijlstra , Paul Mackerras , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org"Srivatsa S. Bhat" Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown below: get_online_cpus(); for_each_online_cpu(cpu) init_cpu(cpu); register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier); put_online_cpus(); This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently with CPU hotplug operations). Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback registration is: cpu_notifier_register_begin(); for_each_online_cpu(cpu) init_cpu(cpu); /* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */ __register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier); cpu_notifier_register_done(); Fix the intel rapl code in x86 by using this latter form of callback registration. Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Paul Mackerras Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: x86@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c index 5ad35ad..059218e 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c @@ -646,19 +646,20 @@ static int __init rapl_pmu_init(void) /* unsupported */ return 0; } - get_online_cpus(); + + cpu_notifier_register_begin(); for_each_online_cpu(cpu) { rapl_cpu_prepare(cpu); rapl_cpu_init(cpu); } - perf_cpu_notifier(rapl_cpu_notifier); + __perf_cpu_notifier(rapl_cpu_notifier); ret = perf_pmu_register(&rapl_pmu_class, "power", -1); if (WARN_ON(ret)) { pr_info("RAPL PMU detected, registration failed (%d), RAPL PMU disabled\n", ret); - put_online_cpus(); + cpu_notifier_register_done(); return -1; } @@ -672,7 +673,7 @@ static int __init rapl_pmu_init(void) hweight32(rapl_cntr_mask), ktime_to_ms(pmu->timer_interval)); - put_online_cpus(); + cpu_notifier_register_done(); return 0; } From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e28smtp06.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.6]:55992 "EHLO e28smtp06.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751139AbaBNIAM (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Feb 2014 03:00:12 -0500 Received: from /spool/local by e28smtp06.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:30:10 +0530 From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Subject: [PATCH v2 24/52] x86, intel, rapl: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:24:41 +0530 Message-ID: <20140214075441.22701.79.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20140214074750.22701.47330.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> References: <20140214074750.22701.47330.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: paulus@samba.org, oleg@redhat.com, mingo@kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, tj@kernel.org, walken@google.com, ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Peter Zijlstra , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org"Srivatsa S. Bhat" Message-ID: <20140214075441.nzRxwWNFy4GvI9gb7W_Q_UIFO8XbKCFntiA0vJuwyM0@z> Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown below: get_online_cpus(); for_each_online_cpu(cpu) init_cpu(cpu); register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier); put_online_cpus(); This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently with CPU hotplug operations). Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback registration is: cpu_notifier_register_begin(); for_each_online_cpu(cpu) init_cpu(cpu); /* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */ __register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier); cpu_notifier_register_done(); Fix the intel rapl code in x86 by using this latter form of callback registration. Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Paul Mackerras Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: x86@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c index 5ad35ad..059218e 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c @@ -646,19 +646,20 @@ static int __init rapl_pmu_init(void) /* unsupported */ return 0; } - get_online_cpus(); + + cpu_notifier_register_begin(); for_each_online_cpu(cpu) { rapl_cpu_prepare(cpu); rapl_cpu_init(cpu); } - perf_cpu_notifier(rapl_cpu_notifier); + __perf_cpu_notifier(rapl_cpu_notifier); ret = perf_pmu_register(&rapl_pmu_class, "power", -1); if (WARN_ON(ret)) { pr_info("RAPL PMU detected, registration failed (%d), RAPL PMU disabled\n", ret); - put_online_cpus(); + cpu_notifier_register_done(); return -1; } @@ -672,7 +673,7 @@ static int __init rapl_pmu_init(void) hweight32(rapl_cntr_mask), ktime_to_ms(pmu->timer_interval)); - put_online_cpus(); + cpu_notifier_register_done(); return 0; }