From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753299AbaBNIFE (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Feb 2014 03:05:04 -0500 Received: from e28smtp02.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.2]:36261 "EHLO e28smtp02.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751937AbaBNIE7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Feb 2014 03:04:59 -0500 From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Subject: [PATCH v2 45/52] hwmon, via-cputemp: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration To: paulus@samba.org, oleg@redhat.com, mingo@kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, tj@kernel.org, walken@google.com, ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Jean Delvare , Ingo Molnar , lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, Guenter Roeck , "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:29:26 +0530 Message-ID: <20140214075925.22701.69267.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20140214074750.22701.47330.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> References: <20140214074750.22701.47330.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> User-Agent: StGIT/0.14.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 14021408-5816-0000-0000-00000C45540B Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown below: get_online_cpus(); for_each_online_cpu(cpu) init_cpu(cpu); register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier); put_online_cpus(); This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently with CPU hotplug operations). Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback registration is: cpu_notifier_register_begin(); for_each_online_cpu(cpu) init_cpu(cpu); /* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */ __register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier); cpu_notifier_register_done(); Fix the hwmon via-cputemp code by using this latter form of callback registration. Cc: Jean Delvare Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org Acked-by: Guenter Roeck Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat --- drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c index 38944e9..8df43c5 100644 --- a/drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c +++ b/drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c @@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ static int __init via_cputemp_init(void) if (err) goto exit; - get_online_cpus(); + cpu_notifier_register_begin(); for_each_online_cpu(i) { struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(i); @@ -339,14 +339,14 @@ static int __init via_cputemp_init(void) #ifndef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU if (list_empty(&pdev_list)) { - put_online_cpus(); + cpu_notifier_register_done(); err = -ENODEV; goto exit_driver_unreg; } #endif - register_hotcpu_notifier(&via_cputemp_cpu_notifier); - put_online_cpus(); + __register_hotcpu_notifier(&via_cputemp_cpu_notifier); + cpu_notifier_register_done(); return 0; #ifndef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU @@ -361,8 +361,8 @@ static void __exit via_cputemp_exit(void) { struct pdev_entry *p, *n; - get_online_cpus(); - unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&via_cputemp_cpu_notifier); + cpu_notifier_register_begin(); + __unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&via_cputemp_cpu_notifier); mutex_lock(&pdev_list_mutex); list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &pdev_list, list) { platform_device_unregister(p->pdev); @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ static void __exit via_cputemp_exit(void) kfree(p); } mutex_unlock(&pdev_list_mutex); - put_online_cpus(); + cpu_notifier_register_done(); platform_driver_unregister(&via_cputemp_driver); } From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Subject: [PATCH v2 45/52] hwmon, via-cputemp: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:29:26 +0530 Message-ID: <20140214075925.22701.69267.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> References: <20140214074750.22701.47330.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140214074750.22701.47330.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: paulus@samba.org, oleg@redhat.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, tj@kernel.org, walken@google.com, ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Jean Delvare , Ingo Molnar , lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, Guenter Roeck "Srivatsa S. Bhat" List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown below: get_online_cpus(); for_each_online_cpu(cpu) init_cpu(cpu); register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier); put_online_cpus(); This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently with CPU hotplug operations). Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback registration is: cpu_notifier_register_begin(); for_each_online_cpu(cpu) init_cpu(cpu); /* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */ __register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier); cpu_notifier_register_done(); Fix the hwmon via-cputemp code by using this latter form of callback registration. Cc: Jean Delvare Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org Acked-by: Guenter Roeck Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat --- drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c index 38944e9..8df43c5 100644 --- a/drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c +++ b/drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c @@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ static int __init via_cputemp_init(void) if (err) goto exit; - get_online_cpus(); + cpu_notifier_register_begin(); for_each_online_cpu(i) { struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(i); @@ -339,14 +339,14 @@ static int __init via_cputemp_init(void) #ifndef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU if (list_empty(&pdev_list)) { - put_online_cpus(); + cpu_notifier_register_done(); err = -ENODEV; goto exit_driver_unreg; } #endif - register_hotcpu_notifier(&via_cputemp_cpu_notifier); - put_online_cpus(); + __register_hotcpu_notifier(&via_cputemp_cpu_notifier); + cpu_notifier_register_done(); return 0; #ifndef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU @@ -361,8 +361,8 @@ static void __exit via_cputemp_exit(void) { struct pdev_entry *p, *n; - get_online_cpus(); - unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&via_cputemp_cpu_notifier); + cpu_notifier_register_begin(); + __unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&via_cputemp_cpu_notifier); mutex_lock(&pdev_list_mutex); list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &pdev_list, list) { platform_device_unregister(p->pdev); @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ static void __exit via_cputemp_exit(void) kfree(p); } mutex_unlock(&pdev_list_mutex); - put_online_cpus(); + cpu_notifier_register_done(); platform_driver_unregister(&via_cputemp_driver); } From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e28smtp02.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.2]:36260 "EHLO e28smtp02.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751758AbaBNIFB (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Feb 2014 03:05:01 -0500 Received: from /spool/local by e28smtp02.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:34:56 +0530 From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Subject: [PATCH v2 45/52] hwmon, via-cputemp: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:29:26 +0530 Message-ID: <20140214075925.22701.69267.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20140214074750.22701.47330.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> References: <20140214074750.22701.47330.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: paulus@samba.org, oleg@redhat.com, mingo@kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, tj@kernel.org, walken@google.com, ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Jean Delvare , lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, Guenter Roeck "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Message-ID: <20140214075926.zknw84uIPcuN38VxwF_rEaBtxwr_eQswjdBLY2piGPU@z> Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown below: get_online_cpus(); for_each_online_cpu(cpu) init_cpu(cpu); register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier); put_online_cpus(); This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently with CPU hotplug operations). Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback registration is: cpu_notifier_register_begin(); for_each_online_cpu(cpu) init_cpu(cpu); /* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */ __register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier); cpu_notifier_register_done(); Fix the hwmon via-cputemp code by using this latter form of callback registration. Cc: Jean Delvare Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org Acked-by: Guenter Roeck Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat --- drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c index 38944e9..8df43c5 100644 --- a/drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c +++ b/drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c @@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ static int __init via_cputemp_init(void) if (err) goto exit; - get_online_cpus(); + cpu_notifier_register_begin(); for_each_online_cpu(i) { struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(i); @@ -339,14 +339,14 @@ static int __init via_cputemp_init(void) #ifndef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU if (list_empty(&pdev_list)) { - put_online_cpus(); + cpu_notifier_register_done(); err = -ENODEV; goto exit_driver_unreg; } #endif - register_hotcpu_notifier(&via_cputemp_cpu_notifier); - put_online_cpus(); + __register_hotcpu_notifier(&via_cputemp_cpu_notifier); + cpu_notifier_register_done(); return 0; #ifndef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU @@ -361,8 +361,8 @@ static void __exit via_cputemp_exit(void) { struct pdev_entry *p, *n; - get_online_cpus(); - unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&via_cputemp_cpu_notifier); + cpu_notifier_register_begin(); + __unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&via_cputemp_cpu_notifier); mutex_lock(&pdev_list_mutex); list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &pdev_list, list) { platform_device_unregister(p->pdev); @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ static void __exit via_cputemp_exit(void) kfree(p); } mutex_unlock(&pdev_list_mutex); - put_online_cpus(); + cpu_notifier_register_done(); platform_driver_unregister(&via_cputemp_driver); } From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 08:11:26 +0000 Subject: [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 45/52] hwmon, via-cputemp: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration Message-Id: <20140214075925.22701.69267.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> List-Id: References: <20140214074750.22701.47330.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20140214074750.22701.47330.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: paulus@samba.org, oleg@redhat.com, mingo@kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, tj@kernel.org, walken@google.com, ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Jean Delvare , lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, Guenter Roeck , "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown below: get_online_cpus(); for_each_online_cpu(cpu) init_cpu(cpu); register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier); put_online_cpus(); This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently with CPU hotplug operations). Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback registration is: cpu_notifier_register_begin(); for_each_online_cpu(cpu) init_cpu(cpu); /* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */ __register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier); cpu_notifier_register_done(); Fix the hwmon via-cputemp code by using this latter form of callback registration. Cc: Jean Delvare Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org Acked-by: Guenter Roeck Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat --- drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c index 38944e9..8df43c5 100644 --- a/drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c +++ b/drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c @@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ static int __init via_cputemp_init(void) if (err) goto exit; - get_online_cpus(); + cpu_notifier_register_begin(); for_each_online_cpu(i) { struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(i); @@ -339,14 +339,14 @@ static int __init via_cputemp_init(void) #ifndef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU if (list_empty(&pdev_list)) { - put_online_cpus(); + cpu_notifier_register_done(); err = -ENODEV; goto exit_driver_unreg; } #endif - register_hotcpu_notifier(&via_cputemp_cpu_notifier); - put_online_cpus(); + __register_hotcpu_notifier(&via_cputemp_cpu_notifier); + cpu_notifier_register_done(); return 0; #ifndef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU @@ -361,8 +361,8 @@ static void __exit via_cputemp_exit(void) { struct pdev_entry *p, *n; - get_online_cpus(); - unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&via_cputemp_cpu_notifier); + cpu_notifier_register_begin(); + __unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&via_cputemp_cpu_notifier); mutex_lock(&pdev_list_mutex); list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &pdev_list, list) { platform_device_unregister(p->pdev); @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ static void __exit via_cputemp_exit(void) kfree(p); } mutex_unlock(&pdev_list_mutex); - put_online_cpus(); + cpu_notifier_register_done(); platform_driver_unregister(&via_cputemp_driver); } _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors