From: Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>
To: kreijack@inwind.it
Cc: Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.net>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] Add command btrfs filesystem disk-usage
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 18:34:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140214183400.GA3351@carfax.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52FE602D.7060109@libero.it>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1878 bytes --]
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 07:27:57PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> On 02/14/2014 07:11 PM, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 18:57:03 +0100
> > Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@libero.it> wrote:
> >
> >> On 02/13/2014 10:00 PM, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 20:49:08 +0100
> >>> Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@libero.it> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Thanks for the comments, however I don't like du not usage; but you are right
> >>>> when you don't like "disk-usage". What about "btrfs filesystem chunk-usage" ?
> >>>
> >>> Personally I don't see the point of being super-pedantic here, i.e. "look this
> >>> is not just filesystem usage, this is filesystem CHUNK usage"... Consistency
> >>> of having a matching "dev usage" and "fi usage" would have been nicer.
> >>
> >>
> >> What about "btrfs filesystem chunk-usage" ?
> >
> > Uhm? Had to reread this several times, but it looks like you're repeating
> > exactly the same question that I was already answering in the quoted part.
> >
> > To clarify even more, personally I'd like if there would have been "btrfs dev
> > usage" and "btrfs fi usage". Do not see the need to specifically make the 2nd
> > one "chunk-usage" instead of simply "usage".
>
> I don't like "usage" because it to me seems to be too much generic.
> Because both "btrfs filesystem disk-usage" and "btrfs device disk-usage"
> report about chunk (and/or block group) infos, I am investigating
> about
> - btrfs filesystem chunk-usage
> - btrfs device chunk-usage
Most people aren't going to know (or care) what a chunk is. I'm
much happier with Roman's suggestion of btrfs {fi,dev} usage.
Hugo.
--
=== Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk ===
PGP key: 65E74AC0 from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk
--- Nostalgia isn't what it used to be. ---
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 811 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-14 18:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-13 19:18 [PATCH][BTRFS-PROGS][v4] Enhance btrfs fi df Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-02-13 19:19 ` [PATCH 1/8] Enhance the command btrfs filesystem df Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-02-13 19:19 ` [PATCH 2/8] Create the man page entry for the command btrfs fi df Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-02-13 19:19 ` [PATCH 3/8] Add helpers functions to handle the printing of data in tabular format Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-02-13 19:19 ` [PATCH 4/8] Allow use of get_device_info() Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-02-20 18:13 ` David Sterba
2014-02-13 19:19 ` [PATCH 5/8] Add command btrfs filesystem disk-usage Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-02-13 19:28 ` Roman Mamedov
2014-02-13 19:49 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-02-13 20:22 ` Duncan
2014-02-13 21:00 ` Roman Mamedov
2014-02-14 17:57 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-02-14 18:11 ` Roman Mamedov
2014-02-14 18:27 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-02-14 18:34 ` Hugo Mills [this message]
2014-02-15 22:23 ` Chris Murphy
2014-02-17 18:09 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-02-20 17:31 ` David Sterba
2014-02-13 19:20 ` [PATCH 6/8] Create entry in man page for " Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-02-13 19:20 ` [PATCH 7/8] Add btrfs device disk-usage command Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-02-13 19:23 ` Roman Mamedov
2014-02-13 19:44 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-02-13 19:20 ` [PATCH 8/8] Create a new entry in btrfs man page for btrfs device disk-usage Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-02-17 18:41 ` [PATCH][BTRFS-PROGS][v4] Enhance btrfs fi df David Sterba
2014-02-17 20:49 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-02-20 18:08 ` David Sterba
2014-02-20 18:32 ` Josef Bacik
2014-02-20 19:20 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-02-22 0:03 ` David Sterba
2014-02-20 19:18 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-03-10 12:17 [PATCH V3][BTRFS-PROGS] Enhance btrfs fi df with raid5/6 support Goffredo Baroncelli
2013-03-10 12:17 ` [PATCH 5/8] Add command btrfs filesystem disk-usage Goffredo Baroncelli
2013-02-23 13:46 [PATCH V2][BTRFS-PROGS] Enhance btrfs fi df with raid5/6 support Goffredo Baroncelli
2013-02-23 13:46 ` [PATCH 5/8] Add command btrfs filesystem disk-usage Goffredo Baroncelli
2013-02-18 21:04 [PATCH][BTRFS-PROGS] Enhance btrfs fi df with raid5/6 support Goffredo Baroncelli
2013-02-18 21:04 ` [PATCH 5/8] Add command btrfs filesystem disk-usage Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-11-02 10:15 [PATCH][BTRFS-PROGS] Enhance btrfs fi df Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-11-02 10:15 ` [PATCH 5/8] Add command btrfs filesystem disk-usage Goffredo Baroncelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140214183400.GA3351@carfax.org.uk \
--to=hugo@carfax.org.uk \
--cc=kreijack@inwind.it \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rm@romanrm.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.