From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754056AbaBTIua (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 20 Feb 2014 03:50:30 -0500
Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:53638 "EHLO
	merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753161AbaBTIu3 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 20 Feb 2014 03:50:29 -0500
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 09:50:17 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Lei Wen <adrian.wenl@gmail.com>
Cc: Lei Wen <leiwen@marvell.com>, mingo@redhat.com, preeti.lkml@gmail.com,
        daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, xjian@marvell.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: keep quiescent cpu out of idle balance loop
Message-ID: <20140220085017.GL6835@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <1392787230-17986-1-git-send-email-leiwen@marvell.com>
 <20140219090415.GK27965@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <CALZhoSQpbJGSEaoOKO_sQQNFBU9UHYQ4bPCXEFfAz=iUm+D7_g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CALZhoSQpbJGSEaoOKO_sQQNFBU9UHYQ4bPCXEFfAz=iUm+D7_g@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:42:51AM +0800, Lei Wen wrote:
> >> -     int ilb = cpumask_first(nohz.idle_cpus_mask);
> >> +     int ilb;
> >> +     int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> >> +     struct sched_domain *tmp;
> >>
> >> -     if (ilb < nr_cpu_ids && idle_cpu(ilb))
> >> -             return ilb;
> >> +     for_each_domain(cpu, tmp) {
> >> +             ilb = cpumask_first_and(nohz.idle_cpus_mask,
> >> +                             sched_domain_span(tmp));
> >> +             if (ilb < nr_cpu_ids && idle_cpu(ilb))
> >> +                     return ilb;
> >> +     }
> >
> > The ILB code is bad; but you just made it horrible. Don't add pointless
> > for_each_domain() iterations.
> >
> > I'm thinking something like:
> >
> >   ilb = cpumask_first_and(nohz.idle_cpus_mask, this_rq()->rd.span);
> >
> > Should work just fine, no?
> 
> Yes, it has the same result as my previous patch did.
> 
> >
> > Better still would be to maybe not participate in the ILB in the first
> > place and leave this selection loop alone.
> 
> Not quitely get your point here...
> Do you mean that you want idle cpu selection be put in earlier place
> than current find_new_ilb is?

I meant that if you stop an idle CPU setting its bit in
nohz.idle_cpus_mask, you don't have to mask it out either.