On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com> 
wrote:
>> 
>> 
> You mean
> 
> "!in_initrd() || access(selinux_path(), F_OK) >= 0"?
> 

I don't think so - that would mean we would silently continue if 
enforcing=1, but we happen to not find a policy on disk.  Right?

I think my patch is better than this - systemd will attempt to load 
policy from *only* the real root (not the initramfs), using the exact 
same logic as is in libselinux currently.

For example, it would allow explicitly specifying enforcing=1 on the 
kernel command line, and that would continue to cause an explicit 
failure if policy is not found.