From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752320AbaBVIsf (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Feb 2014 03:48:35 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:20364 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751363AbaBVIsd (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Feb 2014 03:48:33 -0500 Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 09:50:31 +0100 From: Alexander Gordeev To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Gleb Natapov , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kvm: Use pci_enable_msix_exact() instead of pci_enable_msix() Message-ID: <20140222085030.GA26794@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com> References: <1392804931-30671-11-git-send-email-agordeev@redhat.com> <5304B09D.7010900@redhat.com> <20140221170414.GM17353@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com> <20140221170504.GN17353@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com> <530788C1.6030109@redhat.com> <20140221185620.GA18725@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com> <5307C6D9.4030503@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5307C6D9.4030503@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:36:25PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 21/02/2014 19:56, Alexander Gordeev ha scritto: > >On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 06:11:29PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >>It's okay, but it's not clear to me whether I should include this > >>patch or someone else will. :) > > > >Please, include it. > > And where do I get pci_enable_msix_exact? When will pci_enable_msix > disappear? Commit d158fc7 ("Merge tag 'pci-v3.14-fixes-1'") in Linus's tree has it. pci_enable_msix() is going to be removed once all drivers updated with new interface. > So, do I have to pull something (which I'd rather not, since pulling > the wrong thing in a submaintainer tree will make Linus angry), or > should I do it in the next merge window after pci_enable_msix_exact > gets in? So it is already in. > All in all, it seems much simpler to me if the linux-pci tree just > includes the whole patch series with my Acked-by. > > Paolo > > >Thanks! > > > >>Paolo > > > -- Regards, Alexander Gordeev agordeev@redhat.com