From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753389AbaBYXHc (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Feb 2014 18:07:32 -0500 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:51835 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753178AbaBYXHb (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Feb 2014 18:07:31 -0500 Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 08:07:21 +0900 From: Mark Brown To: Lee Jones Cc: "Opensource [Anthony Olech]" , Samuel Ortiz , Liam Girdwood , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , David Dajun Chen Message-ID: <20140225230721.GA2927@sirena.org.uk> References: <201402191637.s1JGb45N017694@swsrvapps-02.lan> <20140225085701.GD19099@lee--X1> <24DF37198A1E704D9811D8F72B87EB51BCFDB5D2@NB-EX-MBX02.diasemi.com> <20140225115036.GF13246@lee--X1> <20140225121555.GB25940@sirena.org.uk> <20140225124050.GA7571@lee--X1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140225124050.GA7571@lee--X1> X-Cookie: You will be married within a year. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 121.174.50.227 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 2/3] MFD: da9052: Add new DA9053 BC chip variant X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:40:50PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > The advice here is usually that sending against -next is a good proxy > > for sending against the individual tree without having to figure out all > > the different trees - almost all of the time the effect is the same. > > This only applies when sending patches via e-mail, for git pulls it's an > > absolute no of course. > Good point. But it's worth reiterating that this should only be done > if you have dependencies which haven't yet reached Mainline.=20 It can be worth doing anyway with a subsystem that's actively developed since sometimees the dependencies are the other way - the APIs in Linus' tree may have gone away. --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTDSIfAAoJELSic+t+oim9Dh4P/0KRHYoJ0XpdnMuYDwWvVd5D gg9Dy2HKt4EK3pu0OBrWCztlpZpnxM4/iaOjmYisJpYQjX1kxHlEUnZWRJkLNNyX jMTSo8pOKyEeIsDrZqtbCI50T9bCJgU2c9NdkhFe6oeRV3Aj2vfdQwwyVTzS/hJE 7l6i6qryj22Ub4Jw2pCp3KVaJcm9OLV7rayKAi3M93CSRfCH4lZupNw4fdeGS+J+ OwcgIa2e26ME9z9IqJMCdfGzbL7CX7TevrZDUBFR5T0riaUV6WWv1oQJ0t2BJW0R Vcv3RW0rIf/mrRzuQg5urz0mu3amF099/xDtQqAavpPO+UnAAyB5IbvXoiX4nlKx T/ZLaYt8jqRbWCHPdWoUjhXp96RcBucIjwgO99MV1rELW+LhVhPjQ0BKGOcrd0Yi 5vUohyNS+I64g4XxyEIRfKIcnnViCgya2bzzsL0E5jg3DUZRBooAf5QMY3CPB8Kt V1JeCoz+/PQIbvUT03J7ZobO5DSgSHCTzM6U3TjJw6ORiTTL40f5tXdddDYxvAdj S9dCIc4xe9mt1SF39TQUTqAn98BvUGDk4x+/xfY28+f2T8JUYHkGOPxCgtwTe00v qwsxw24VW5oDiQCM8oT6MTm6c97xXI54fBAaF2+oueOu+Yd9zznUpHlTu7zZLhuO alCFSq21OXV8FchrVixL =Zrir -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5--