From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753940AbaB0R00 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Feb 2014 12:26:26 -0500 Received: from relay3.sgi.com ([192.48.152.1]:58564 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753329AbaB0R0X (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Feb 2014 12:26:23 -0500 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:26:28 -0600 From: Alex Thorlton To: Andrew Morton Cc: Christian Borntraeger , Oleg Nesterov , Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, rientjes@google.com, riel@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, mingo@kernel.org, mgorman@suse.de, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, aarcange@redhat.com Subject: Re: + mm-revert-thp-make-madv_hugepage-check-for-mm-def_flags.patch added to -mm tree Message-ID: <20140227172628.GD18555@sgi.com> References: <20140226145025.GA12571@redhat.com> <530E0306.7020601@de.ibm.com> <20140226153144.GA15527@redhat.com> <20140226165759.GB22802@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20140226172253.GQ3041@sgi.com> <20140226180603.GA25644@redhat.com> <530E4028.70903@de.ibm.com> <20140226193917.GR3041@sgi.com> <20140226152434.8faabadc7f4f8d6475d58f88@linux-foundation.org> <20140227000153.GC18555@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140227000153.GC18555@sgi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 06:01:53PM -0600, Alex Thorlton wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 03:24:34PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 13:39:17 -0600 Alex Thorlton wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd suggest the patch below on top of your changes, but I won't argue. > > > > > > I like this approach, and your updated comment as well. This should > > > probably go in as [PATCH 2/4] in my series. Do I need to spin a v5 > > > with this new patch included in the series, or will Andrew pull this in? > > > > Paolo's comments on Oleg's patch remain unaddressed, so please take a > > look at that and send out the final version? > > Got it. I'll get that to you tonight/tomorrow morning. Just kicked out another version of the patch that should cover all comments/suggestions. Let me know if you need anything else from me! - Alex