All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com>
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Cc: "Miklos Szeredi" <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	Linux-Fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com,
	"Stéphane Graber" <stephane.graber@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] overlayfs,xattr: allow unprivileged users to whiteout
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 10:23:06 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140228162306.GA13215@sergelap> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140228145514.GD4334@dm>

Quoting Andy Whitcroft (apw@canonical.com):
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 03:15:14PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > > To mark a file which exists in the lower layer as deleted,
> > > it creates a symbolic link to a file called "(overlay-whiteout)"
> > > in the writeable mount, and sets a "trusted.overlay" xattr
> > > on that link.
> > >
> > > 1. When the create the symbolic link as container root, not
> > > as the global root
> > >
> > > 2. Allow root in a container to edit "trusted.overlay*"
> > > xattrs.  Generally only global root is allowed to edit
> > > "trusted.*"
> > 
> > Shouldn't overlayfs just skip the permission checks and call
> > __vfs_setxattr_noperm() instead?
> 
> It does seem we should be avoiding the permissions here, as we have let
> the thing be mounted we have done the permissions checks for that and for
> the file access itself already.  This operation is something we definatly
> want to represent in the filesystem.

D'oh.  Yeah, that looks good.   Andy, should I send a new patch, or
can you make those changes inline?

-serge

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-28 16:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-25 17:31 [PATCH RFC] overlayfs,xattr: allow unprivileged users to whiteout Serge Hallyn
2014-02-28 14:15 ` Miklos Szeredi
2014-02-28 14:55   ` Andy Whitcroft
2014-02-28 16:23     ` Serge Hallyn [this message]
2014-03-05 17:46     ` [RFC] overlayfs priviledge escalation handling under user namespaces Andy Whitcroft
2014-03-05 17:46       ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] overlayfs: switch to the init user namespace for xattr operations Andy Whitcroft
2014-03-05 17:46       ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] overlayfs: use kernel service credentials for copy up and xattr manipulations Andy Whitcroft
2014-03-05 20:01         ` Serge Hallyn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140228162306.GA13215@sergelap \
    --to=serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=apw@canonical.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=stephane.graber@canonical.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.