From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: brouer@redhat.com
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
pablo@netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, fw@strlen.de,
kaber@trash.net
Subject: Re: [nf-next PATCH V2 0/5] netfilter: conntrack: optimization, remove central spinlock
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 20:14:08 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140302.201408.1852916497663090292.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140228121529.20347.38300.stgit@dragon>
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 13:16:15 +0100
> This patchset change the conntrack locking and provides a huge
> performance improvements.
I no longer have any concerns, looks good to me.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-03 1:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-27 18:23 [nf-next PATCH 0/5] (repost) netfilter: conntrack: optimization, remove central spinlock Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-02-27 18:23 ` [nf-next PATCH 1/5] netfilter: trivial code cleanup and doc changes Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-02-27 18:23 ` [nf-next PATCH 2/5] netfilter: conntrack: spinlock per cpu to protect special lists Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-02-27 18:23 ` [nf-next PATCH 3/5] netfilter: avoid race with exp->master ct Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-02-27 21:34 ` Florian Westphal
2014-02-28 11:30 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-02-27 18:23 ` [nf-next PATCH 4/5] netfilter: conntrack: seperate expect locking from nf_conntrack_lock Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-02-27 18:23 ` [nf-next PATCH 5/5] netfilter: conntrack: remove central spinlock nf_conntrack_lock Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-02-27 23:34 ` [nf-next PATCH 0/5] (repost) netfilter: conntrack: optimization, remove central spinlock David Miller
2014-02-28 9:47 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-02-28 12:16 ` [nf-next PATCH V2 0/5] " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-02-28 12:16 ` [nf-next PATCH V2 1/5] netfilter: trivial code cleanup and doc changes Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-02-28 12:17 ` [nf-next PATCH V2 2/5] netfilter: conntrack: spinlock per cpu to protect special lists Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-02-28 12:17 ` [nf-next PATCH V2 3/5] netfilter: avoid race with exp->master ct Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-02-28 12:17 ` [nf-next PATCH V2 4/5] netfilter: conntrack: seperate expect locking from nf_conntrack_lock Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-02-28 15:08 ` Florian Westphal
2014-03-03 11:33 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-02-28 12:17 ` [nf-next PATCH V2 5/5] netfilter: conntrack: remove central spinlock nf_conntrack_lock Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-03-03 1:14 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140302.201408.1852916497663090292.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.