From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from 220-245-31-42.static.tpgi.com.au ([220.245.31.42]:43295 "EHLO smtp.sws.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753603AbaCCBKD (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Mar 2014 20:10:03 -0500 From: Russell Coker Reply-To: russell@coker.com.au To: Chris Murphy , "linux-btrfs" Subject: Re: btrfsck does not fix Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 12:09:59 +1100 References: <52C7127F.3060902@friedels.name> <53010EF9.60805@friedels.name> <21AD6EBC-FDDA-4BDE-B0B4-D6A8BBAD58F0@colorremedies.com> In-Reply-To: <21AD6EBC-FDDA-4BDE-B0B4-D6A8BBAD58F0@colorremedies.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <201403031209.59316.russell@coker.com.au> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 17 Feb 2014, Chris Murphy wrote: > Also, 10 hours to balance two disks at 2.3TB seems like a long time. I'm > not sure if that's expected. I just had a system with a single 120G Intel SSD and 54G of data stored take 3 hours for a balance. Balance seems to be a very slow operation and it also uses enough capacity (both disk IO and CPU time for BTRFS kernel threads) to seriously degrade system performance for the duration. -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/