From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] input/serio: Add a firmware_id sysfs attribute Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 09:00:53 +0000 Message-ID: <20140328090053.GA10597@srcf.ucam.org> References: <1395310330-3232-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> <20140320172159.GA27400@srcf.ucam.org> <20140328075655.GE22093@core.coreip.homeip.net> <53352EFB.8000309@redhat.com> <20140328081739.GG22093@core.coreip.homeip.net> <533532FE.2000304@redhat.com> <20140328085207.GN22093@core.coreip.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140328085207.GN22093@core.coreip.homeip.net> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Hans de Goede , Benjamin Tissoires , Peter Hutterer , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org List-Id: platform-driver-x86.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 01:52:07AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > Are we even certain that they will be consistent in use of these special > PNP ID's? Maybe you should really do DMI match... The Windows drivers bind on PNP IDs, not DMI. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org