From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Torokhov Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] input/serio: Add a firmware_id sysfs attribute Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 09:04:22 -0700 Message-ID: <20140328160421.GA22658@core.coreip.homeip.net> References: <1395310330-3232-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> <20140320172159.GA27400@srcf.ucam.org> <20140328075655.GE22093@core.coreip.homeip.net> <53352EFB.8000309@redhat.com> <20140328081739.GG22093@core.coreip.homeip.net> <533532FE.2000304@redhat.com> <20140328085207.GN22093@core.coreip.homeip.net> <20140328090053.GA10597@srcf.ucam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f42.google.com ([209.85.220.42]:36685 "EHLO mail-pa0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751926AbaC1QE1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Mar 2014 12:04:27 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140328090053.GA10597@srcf.ucam.org> Sender: platform-driver-x86-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Matthew Garrett Cc: Hans de Goede , Benjamin Tissoires , Peter Hutterer , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 09:00:53AM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 01:52:07AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > > Are we even certain that they will be consistent in use of these special > > PNP ID's? Maybe you should really do DMI match... > > The Windows drivers bind on PNP IDs, not DMI. OK, fair enough. -- Dmitry