From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751384AbaDAJ4Q (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Apr 2014 05:56:16 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-f172.google.com ([74.125.82.172]:62675 "EHLO mail-we0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751349AbaDAJzw (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Apr 2014 05:55:52 -0400 Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 11:55:48 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Mike Galbraith Cc: Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: update_rq_clock() must skip ONE update Message-ID: <20140401095548.GB1299@gmail.com> References: <1396164244.28950.15.camel@marge.simpson.net> <1396239636.5361.57.camel@marge.simpson.net> <1396290426.5261.80.camel@marge.simpson.net> <1396322880.5324.37.camel@marge.simpson.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1396322880.5324.37.camel@marge.simpson.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 11:37 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Mike Galbraith > > wrote: > > > > > > Oh, I didn't cc you because I wanted it applied instantly as ultra > > > critical, only because the chain of events might be of interest. > > > > Ok. That was my main worry, since I was in the process or releasing > > 3.14, and I just couldn't tell if the patch was something I should > > worry about or not. > > > > And it seems that not applying it was the right thing, which is all > > that matters by now. > > Yes. Jocular red flag was to Peter and Ingo. I don't try to bypass > them, that would be plain rude. I've been known to help maintainers > a little, but I don't ever try to call the shots. They do that > well. Btw., in general feel free to Cc: Linus if a fix looks truly urgent, as neither Peter nor me might be around on a weekend, shortly before a release. Thanks, Ingo