From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 10:52:17 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 06/13] USB: gadget: added a saner gadget
	downloader registration API
In-Reply-To: <20140403094622.518f6691@amdc2363>
References: <1389277919-15279-1-git-send-email-m.zalega@samsung.com>
	<201404030028.31582.marex@denx.de>
	<20140403094622.518f6691@amdc2363>
Message-ID: <201404031052.17157.marex@denx.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Thursday, April 03, 2014 at 09:46:22 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> Hi Marek,
> 
> > On Wednesday, April 02, 2014 at 08:35:33 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > > Hi Mateusz,
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > > Acked-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
> > 
> > I suggest this goes for -next. Do you agree?
> 
> I'm fine with this code going to -next. Thanks in advance.

Hm, actually, I see we have open issues with the 04/13 V2 patch (why don't you 
have default __weak usb_cable_detection() implementation instead of another 
#ifdef ?).

The whole patchset is a mix of completely unrelated things which should go 
through different trees. Can the patchset be reordered/split in some reasonable 
chunks ? There are fixes which should go in immediatelly and then features which 
should go in for -next.

btw. please keep custodians on CC of the respective patches.

Best regards,
Marek Vasut