From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] ARM: Add Krait L2 register accessor functions Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 18:42:29 +0200 Message-ID: <20140408164228.GM30077@pd.tnic> References: <1396641450-12854-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <1396641450-12854-3-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <20140407201838.GC20822@pd.tnic> <20140407215649.GH9985@codeaurora.org> <20140408064328.GB30077@pd.tnic> <534406BD.8000702@codeaurora.org> <20140408151056.GH30077@pd.tnic> <20140408171929.68f328a9@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:39789 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756024AbaDHQmd (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Apr 2014 12:42:33 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140408171929.68f328a9@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: One Thousand Gnomes Cc: Christopher Covington , Stephen Boyd , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, Mark Rutland , Russell King , Courtney Cavin On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 05:19:29PM +0100, One Thousand Gnomes wrote: > Including the without warranty is standard practice at a lot of > companies. It's not even wasting space - it'll compress beautifully as > there are already lots of similar headers all over the tree. Right, I was just trying to find out from Stephen/Christopher whether they're actually really required by legal to slap the boilerplate or they can get by with a smaller chunk. That's all. But thanks for this Alan, I was hoping someone would school me on the legal practice wrt license boilerplates in the kernel, and there you are. :-) Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. -- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bp@alien8.de (Borislav Petkov) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 18:42:29 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v6 2/5] ARM: Add Krait L2 register accessor functions In-Reply-To: <20140408171929.68f328a9@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk> References: <1396641450-12854-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <1396641450-12854-3-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <20140407201838.GC20822@pd.tnic> <20140407215649.GH9985@codeaurora.org> <20140408064328.GB30077@pd.tnic> <534406BD.8000702@codeaurora.org> <20140408151056.GH30077@pd.tnic> <20140408171929.68f328a9@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk> Message-ID: <20140408164228.GM30077@pd.tnic> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 05:19:29PM +0100, One Thousand Gnomes wrote: > Including the without warranty is standard practice at a lot of > companies. It's not even wasting space - it'll compress beautifully as > there are already lots of similar headers all over the tree. Right, I was just trying to find out from Stephen/Christopher whether they're actually really required by legal to slap the boilerplate or they can get by with a smaller chunk. That's all. But thanks for this Alan, I was hoping someone would school me on the legal practice wrt license boilerplates in the kernel, and there you are. :-) Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. --