From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934013AbaDIRFE (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Apr 2014 13:05:04 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:5465 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933353AbaDIRFC (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Apr 2014 13:05:02 -0400 Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 19:05:05 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers , Frederic Weisbecker , LKML , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Was: Convert process iteration to use for_each_process_thread() Message-ID: <20140409170505.GA27638@redhat.com> References: <1397059882-23063-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <1397059882-23063-3-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <360091921.1294.1397060915052.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <20140409124249.4081e665@gandalf.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140409124249.4081e665@gandalf.local.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/09, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > The tasklist_lock is all that is needed. Yes, but not _irq. Plus this code is buggy ;) Steven, I sent these patches twice (at least!). This time I didn't bother to recheck this code, but the patches still apply so perhaps you can take a look? Last attempt, I promise ;) Oleg.