From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] spi: sirf: correct TXFIFO empty interrupt status bit Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 21:02:08 +0100 Message-ID: <20140414200208.GT25182@sirena.org.uk> References: <1397457001-5266-1-git-send-email-21cnbao@gmail.com> <1397457001-5266-2-git-send-email-21cnbao@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wiiWofWi8Et/oezL" Cc: linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, workgroup.linux-kQvG35nSl+M@public.gmane.org, Qipan Li , Barry Song To: Barry Song <21cnbao-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1397457001-5266-2-git-send-email-21cnbao-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-spi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: --wiiWofWi8Et/oezL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:29:57PM +0800, Barry Song wrote: > From: Qipan Li >=20 > the old code uses wrong marco - SIRFSOC_SPI_FIFO_FULL is not for > FIFO interrupt status, it is for FIFO status. here in the ISR, > SIRFSOC_SPI_TXFIFO_EMPTY is the right bit for SPI TXFIFO interrupt > status. Applied, thanks. --wiiWofWi8Et/oezL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTTD69AAoJELSic+t+oim9dd8QAJmx8sMUdTvHht5JpGntHeYY hPmBcTlW1B44hBZeD3n6Vk10R1QVUoG8iYiS9lsBjwGPviKUC874Cj2DJwwb0dfU XuUJ9JQ7fUIVXq5RsKZKrYNRBJauWsCFDJYfxprFf8kcKsaCnzn1UzMPIZuV99Tg 5Y/eDMjd2lEz+CMtB54mrU43enPCcMkIiWysjr4aVjpH4S2aKo8pVqjCOK/iTzXd 4NBbKKl/JwDsHfB5Jzrj7MEL84BLHnA3wm6klaQTvIHWOXRTQLCo2wbG2dpsDOK4 cIs3mzjhWPree2bwB3deQnrAYQSYp6V/AC1V1TVfvZ8yUnjDX9UAGs9OhlDUSA0F Qdh9mXx5b+w9r2QCRP2J+BRX3zZPfx0RZOJ7s4sLVwUmDVEkLLsB/6FOkCWgvbyG RWn2nXlpxX8vgSMcyCOIaguQGijRfaT7jt1ajjEZfnNBSv1QPEeosUT4Bvb0ho4Q ofOkkmCTpaR+VqmyTHtmx9qb8y5u/ktA5nDEqP8XTfNhel7OLc0dHZ0p/fjx9sP6 f2ogrmqL6sONAMdBTZiak+PbTKKrAex3KximmlHD+Mg6IfR8IQLAlEmZzpFfwEtY dM1ROW1gz1YZaxnil0T4UYSh8Uythd6UpL2z3BdCs9ttaGXMP69fpruzdKume67q fn0+P1rfm6r5RXmP3ZOJ =0Spc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wiiWofWi8Et/oezL-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 21:02:08 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/5] spi: sirf: correct TXFIFO empty interrupt status bit In-Reply-To: <1397457001-5266-2-git-send-email-21cnbao@gmail.com> References: <1397457001-5266-1-git-send-email-21cnbao@gmail.com> <1397457001-5266-2-git-send-email-21cnbao@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20140414200208.GT25182@sirena.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:29:57PM +0800, Barry Song wrote: > From: Qipan Li > > the old code uses wrong marco - SIRFSOC_SPI_FIFO_FULL is not for > FIFO interrupt status, it is for FIFO status. here in the ISR, > SIRFSOC_SPI_TXFIFO_EMPTY is the right bit for SPI TXFIFO interrupt > status. Applied, thanks. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: