From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AFFA7F4E for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 01:58:10 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACE27AC001 for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2014 23:58:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Z0cb06AnZA8XdvBf (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2014 23:58:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 23:58:08 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: return is not a function Message-ID: <20140421065808.GB20384@infradead.org> References: <534EC073.8090006@sandeen.net> <534EC173.7010903@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <534EC173.7010903@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: xfs-oss On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:44:19PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > return is not a function. "return(EIO);" is silly; > "return (EIO);" moreso. return is not a function. > Nuke the pointless parens. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs