Re: [ANN] FSL Test Plan Announcement 1.6

From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
To: "Daiane.Angolini@freescale.com" <Daiane.Angolini@freescale.com>
Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" <meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org>
Subject: Re: [ANN] FSL Test Plan Announcement 1.6
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 00:40:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140422224007.GQ3461@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140417144436.GM2813@piout.net>

Hi,

One last thing to add to the test plan would be ethernet connectivity as
a lot of the boards have that available.

I finished to filled for all the cfa boards today but I'll send a patch
to tweak the kernel configuration so that they behave a bit better
(mainly removing a lot of debug and better handling of the USB phy)

On 17/04/2014 at 16:44:36 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote :
> On 07/04/2014 at 14:19:00 +0000, Daiane.Angolini@freescale.com wrote :
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Alexandre Belloni [mailto:alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 7:54 PM
> > > To: Angolini Daiane-B19406
> > > Cc: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
> > > Subject: Re: [meta-freescale] [ANN] FSL Test Plan Announcement 1.6
> > > 
> > > Hi Daiane,
> > > 
> > > On 04/04/2014 at 17:57:26 +0000, Daiane.Angolini@freescale.com wrote :
> > > > The goal test plan for this release is:
> > > >
> > > > MUST HAVE:
> > > > * all 29 boards MUST reach the user space prompt
> > > > * all i.MX6 boards MUST have running accelerated
> > > >     * x11
> > > >     * framebuffer
> > > >     * wayland
> > > >     * directfb
> > > > * all i.MX6 boards MUST have GPU and VPU support for both SFP and HFP
> > > > * all 29 boards MUST play at least one movie
> > > 
> > > I'm not sure it is worth playing movie on the few boards that don't have a
> > > screen ;)
> > 
> > Humm, It´s something that I´m always /not absolutely sure/.
> > 
> > But, why would a board with a multimemdia chip not play a movie of have a "screen"
> > 
> > In our current board list, only vybrid is not supposed to be "multimedia chip"
> > 
> > And, wandboard, for example, does not have an screen until you plug HDMI.
> > 
> > And don´t forget imx28/imx233, the chip does not have VPU, but I always work to get playback working on it.
> > 
> > So, I´m think say /all boards must play at least one movie/ is not that wrong. But of course I can add "when applicable"
> > 
> 
> Yeah, I would add when applicable and I would add a "not applicable"
> choice in the Multimedia sections. The cfa10036 and cfa10037 don"t have
> any video output of any kind LCD, VGA, HDMI...
> 
> > > 
> > > > * all 29 boards MUST encode at least one kind of movie
> > > 
> > > Same here, I don't have any board able to capture video...
> > > I don't have any audio out either.
> > 
> > Here I agree that this should be SHOULD not MUST. Or add a "when applicable".
> > 
> > In your opinion, what would be a better Test Goals? Would you mind to re-write mine and to share it?
> > 
> 
> I think the tests goals are fine as these allow to test the integration
> of all the software stack. It is just that some crystalfontz boards are
> not designed for multimedia so I can't test audio and/or video.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
> Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
> http://free-electrons.com
> -- 
> _______________________________________________
> meta-freescale mailing list
> meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com