From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] devicetree: bindings: Document Krait cache error interrupts Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 21:02:01 +0200 Message-ID: <20140429190200.GD22062@pd.tnic> References: <1396641450-12854-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <1396641450-12854-4-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <20140408153925.GJ30077@pd.tnic> <20140429103400.GB22015@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:53577 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965000AbaD2TCE (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:02:04 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140429103400.GB22015@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Lorenzo Pieralisi Cc: Stephen Boyd , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" , Mark Rutland , Kumar Gala , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:34:00AM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > Sorry for the delay in replying. Those cache bindings need an ACK > to get merged, and were introduced so that idle states can retrieve > power domain information for caches. I am going to revive the idle > bindings thread to see what we can/should merge of these bindings as > things stand, I really hope this won't block the series any further, > otherwise we can rework the patches so that this series can get in > first, or simplify my series to allow both to get merged as soon as > possible without compromising future requirements. Right, I think this is Stephen's call. AFAIR, the current state of affairs is for a followup patchset to come up which I can ack for the EDAC bits and then another maintainer picks the whole thing up. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. -- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965033AbaD2TCH (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:02:07 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:53577 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965000AbaD2TCE (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:02:04 -0400 Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 21:02:01 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Lorenzo Pieralisi Cc: Stephen Boyd , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" , Mark Rutland , Kumar Gala , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] devicetree: bindings: Document Krait cache error interrupts Message-ID: <20140429190200.GD22062@pd.tnic> References: <1396641450-12854-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <1396641450-12854-4-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <20140408153925.GJ30077@pd.tnic> <20140429103400.GB22015@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140429103400.GB22015@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:34:00AM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > Sorry for the delay in replying. Those cache bindings need an ACK > to get merged, and were introduced so that idle states can retrieve > power domain information for caches. I am going to revive the idle > bindings thread to see what we can/should merge of these bindings as > things stand, I really hope this won't block the series any further, > otherwise we can rework the patches so that this series can get in > first, or simplify my series to allow both to get merged as soon as > possible without compromising future requirements. Right, I think this is Stephen's call. AFAIR, the current state of affairs is for a followup patchset to come up which I can ack for the EDAC bits and then another maintainer picks the whole thing up. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. -- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bp@alien8.de (Borislav Petkov) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 21:02:01 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v6 3/5] devicetree: bindings: Document Krait cache error interrupts In-Reply-To: <20140429103400.GB22015@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1396641450-12854-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <1396641450-12854-4-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <20140408153925.GJ30077@pd.tnic> <20140429103400.GB22015@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Message-ID: <20140429190200.GD22062@pd.tnic> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:34:00AM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > Sorry for the delay in replying. Those cache bindings need an ACK > to get merged, and were introduced so that idle states can retrieve > power domain information for caches. I am going to revive the idle > bindings thread to see what we can/should merge of these bindings as > things stand, I really hope this won't block the series any further, > otherwise we can rework the patches so that this series can get in > first, or simplify my series to allow both to get merged as soon as > possible without compromising future requirements. Right, I think this is Stephen's call. AFAIR, the current state of affairs is for a followup patchset to come up which I can ack for the EDAC bits and then another maintainer picks the whole thing up. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. --