From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tim Deegan Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/EPT: flush cache when (potentially) limiting cachability Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 15:39:40 +0200 Message-ID: <20140501133940.GC86038@deinos.phlegethon.org> References: <535A6D71020000780000C4B4@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WfrDD-0006RP-Lj for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 01 May 2014 13:39:43 +0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <535A6D71020000780000C4B4@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: xen-devel , Kevin Tian , Keir Fraser , Eddie Dong , Jun Nakajima List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org At 13:13 +0100 on 25 Apr (1398427985), Jan Beulich wrote: > While generally such guest side changes ought to be followed by guest > initiated flushes, we're flushing the cache under similar conditions > elsewhere (e.g. when the guest sets CR0.CD), so let's do so here too. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Reviewed-by: Tim Deegan