From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: mc13783: Add devicetree support Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 18:49:34 -0700 Message-ID: <20140503014934.GB22111@sirena.org.uk> References: <1398495423-2223-1-git-send-email-shc_work@mail.ru> <20140429222522.GS15125@sirena.org.uk> <20140430140849.GR29462@lee--X1> <1398867073.695596467@f224.i.mail.ru> <20140430141708.GS29462@lee--X1> <20140430180653.GB3245@sirena.org.uk> <20140501074253.GA32761@lee--X1> <20140501150653.GZ3245@sirena.org.uk> <20140502080944.GA5206@lee--X1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6278849073951485969==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140502080944.GA5206@lee--X1> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Lee Jones Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Samuel Ortiz , Alexander Shiyan , Takashi Iwai , Liam Girdwood List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --===============6278849073951485969== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="V0207lvV8h4k8FAm" Content-Disposition: inline --V0207lvV8h4k8FAm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 09:09:44AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On Thu, 01 May 2014, Mark Brown wrote: > > Sure, but I didn't see an urgent need for that immediately so I just > > went ahead - the ack usually means that it's OK to apply. > Hmm... I'm inclined to disagree. The Ack is a marker that I'm okay > with the changes, but the note after makes it pretty clear that the > preference would be for the patch to be handled via an IB. Right, and it's sitting on a separate branch which is (as we've seen) very easy to add a tag to if it turns out to be needed. This is what all the small topic branches are there for, it makes it really easy to cross merge, and obviously applying the patch on a branch is always going to be the first step in creating an immutable branch. It certainly doesn't seem worth getting worried about. Really, if you're not happy for something to be applied you probably don't want to be acking it or you at least want to be really explicit about things. --V0207lvV8h4k8FAm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTZEslAAoJELSic+t+oim9qNgP/1eYWmEaAgSa5iAWAye0EJvN MX2wFTUf4ciqdDWP1dbYArGqYChHIo3mFj/Oz7JLK9nspsC7x6orxgPIyzy4tU7g zhqMgcri/dzpTBfV0DPV7T7dRAZD0DuXsTP0oggqYRoqep+IKKG2PjZMBz5+d0ry m2AR2ZIQsR/AO6ZmYkKVra47dPBpxkH4XJgoQqurbQLzbx34J9Fh0sFJP7rCd1xJ PlOVGHXODtnTiUSlnqY+A+JR8+PyZ5mgcF6GZrG4O3HKowTYFYwwsly1c9XdSJtw OR8vZ6ykoKlNi1BmgvY+UOqZsV6dC9dpS+EksL5o7JcgCSssfNw+33UYULztdHK7 OufBs3AfLXbcpbesrzQJDT4vLDPjp0YgQ8VWCz84jS4ys0Flc8px8v5ut2RzvHsU 4o6ZkbSO/LeIbvku1H97XKMKEiLCrpqgdEbnCQm0jGzSctSYVNk7eksPpRow8ol6 zjYtNZVAM6IK8vxtni7IEz8PnkUHoLpe77eXZzOQQnrhGBspJwphBEpqpMTIsUDQ suCCAUI9UutPehBFE+VLKQkXXI2NhIGi2RoFcYBOPux3q0bhCdHlioP8mjWTeDJ6 bxIJlT+nQmMNYiPIL7p7/n1G3cG1aU4pwecE0rIY+IT5fGVjrE5vget82X3HP6OV EkV2ALXlZnv4v63VrmZM =jjkq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --V0207lvV8h4k8FAm-- --===============6278849073951485969== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline --===============6278849073951485969==--