From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757143AbaEFIvx (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2014 04:51:53 -0400 Received: from cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com ([217.140.96.50]:52297 "EHLO cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934344AbaEFIvt (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2014 04:51:49 -0400 Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 09:51:44 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Jean Pihet Cc: Jean Pihet , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mark Rutland , "linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" , Steve Capper , Peter Zijlstra , Patch Tracking , Frederic Weisbecker , Corey Ashford , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Paul Mackerras , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , David Ahern , Namhyung Kim , Jiri Olsa , Ingo Molnar , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf tests: Introduce perf_regs_load function on ARM64 Message-ID: <20140506085144.GA26592@arm.com> References: <1398690730-5454-1-git-send-email-jean.pihet@linaro.org> <20140502165105.GD20642@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 08:07:11AM +0100, Jean Pihet wrote: > Hi Will, > > On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 10:19:38AM +0100, Jean Pihet wrote: > >> Hi WIll, Mark, > >> > >> Ping on this series. Can you please check? Is the refreshed patch OK? > > > > Fine by me, as long as it's not reused outside of this test :) > Great! Is there some precaution to avoid a mis-reuse? Hopefully your comment will be enough. > Other than that, which tree are the patches going to? They're all under perf/tools/, so they should go via that tree. Will From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon) Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 09:51:44 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] perf tests: Introduce perf_regs_load function on ARM64 In-Reply-To: References: <1398690730-5454-1-git-send-email-jean.pihet@linaro.org> <20140502165105.GD20642@arm.com> Message-ID: <20140506085144.GA26592@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 08:07:11AM +0100, Jean Pihet wrote: > Hi Will, > > On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 10:19:38AM +0100, Jean Pihet wrote: > >> Hi WIll, Mark, > >> > >> Ping on this series. Can you please check? Is the refreshed patch OK? > > > > Fine by me, as long as it's not reused outside of this test :) > Great! Is there some precaution to avoid a mis-reuse? Hopefully your comment will be enough. > Other than that, which tree are the patches going to? They're all under perf/tools/, so they should go via that tree. Will