From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [V10 PATCH 0/4] pvh dom0 patches...
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 17:04:27 -0700
Message-ID: <20140507170427.53580df0@mantra.us.oracle.com>
References: <1398820008-9005-1-git-send-email-mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>
	<5361049B.7040409@citrix.com>
	<20140430111216.2bef8e60@mantra.us.oracle.com>
	<20140430181923.68d75467@mantra.us.oracle.com>
	<53637BF3.2000502@citrix.com>
	<20140502170114.7ec2a9e6@mantra.us.oracle.com>
	<53675166.30400@citrix.com>
	<20140505172858.4c6c3f0a@mantra.us.oracle.com>
	<53688B84.8090607@citrix.com>
	<20140506180053.7c6da000@mantra.us.oracle.com>
	<536A01D8020000780000FB15@mail.emea.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>) id 1WiBpJ-0003WI-Lq
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 08 May 2014 00:04:41 +0000
In-Reply-To: <536A01D8020000780000FB15@mail.emea.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, keir.xen@gmail.com, tim@xen.org, roger.pau@citrix.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Wed, 07 May 2014 08:50:16 +0100
"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:

> >>> On 07.05.14 at 03:00, <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com> wrote:
> > As Konrad points out, there are other issues with that part of the
> > code. So, IMO, we should wait and address that altogether for both
> > PV and PVH, and for now leave this as is.
> 
> I'm fine either way, as long as you and Roger can reach agreement.
> I still tend towards considering Roger's position the right one as a
> mid/long term route.

Ok, will let Roger drive that on xen, and I'll look at linux side. But
since his patch is incremental on top of mine, I find request reasonable
that my next version V12 be checked in if no issues, or at least 
construct_dom0 patch which is sitting reviewed for over 6 months now. 

thanks,
Mukesh