From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: 3.15-rc4: circular locking dependency triggered by dm-multipath
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 16:53:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140507205333.GA29666@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5368ABE8.9050909@acm.org>
Hi Bart,
On Tue, May 06 2014 at 5:31am -0400,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Has anyone else perhaps already run into this ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
>
> ======================================================
> [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> 3.15.0-rc4-debug+ #1 Not tainted
> -------------------------------------------------------
> multipathd/10364 is trying to acquire lock:
> (&(&q->__queue_lock)->rlock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffffa043bff3>] dm_table_run_md_queue_async+0x33/0x60 [dm_mod]
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> (&(&m->lock)->rlock){..-...}, at: [<ffffffffa077a647>] queue_if_no_path+0x27/0xc0 [dm_multipath]
>
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
>
>
> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
>
> -> #1 (&(&m->lock)->rlock){..-...}:
> [<ffffffff810a56c3>] lock_acquire+0x93/0x1c0
> [<ffffffff814ae8eb>] _raw_spin_lock+0x3b/0x50
> [<ffffffffa043a3e9>] dm_blk_open+0x19/0x80 [dm_mod]
> [<ffffffff811cbc41>] __blkdev_get+0xd1/0x4c0
> [<ffffffff811cc215>] blkdev_get+0x1e5/0x380
> [<ffffffff811cc45b>] blkdev_open+0x5b/0x80
> [<ffffffff8118a12e>] do_dentry_open.isra.15+0x1de/0x2a0
> [<ffffffff8118a300>] finish_open+0x30/0x40
> [<ffffffff8119c44d>] do_last.isra.61+0xa5d/0x1200
> [<ffffffff8119cca7>] path_openat+0xb7/0x620
> [<ffffffff8119d88a>] do_filp_open+0x3a/0x90
> [<ffffffff8118bb4e>] do_sys_open+0x12e/0x210
> [<ffffffff8118bc4e>] SyS_open+0x1e/0x20
> [<ffffffff814b84e2>] tracesys+0xd0/0xd5
I'm not sure what lockdep is trying to communicate for #1 here. Not
seeing where m->lock is taken in the above stack. Nor does it appear to
take q->queue_lock.
> -> #0 (&(&q->__queue_lock)->rlock){-.-...}:
> [<ffffffff810a4c46>] __lock_acquire+0x1716/0x1a00
> [<ffffffff810a56c3>] lock_acquire+0x93/0x1c0
> [<ffffffff814aea56>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x46/0x60
> [<ffffffffa043bff3>] dm_table_run_md_queue_async+0x33/0x60 [dm_mod]
> [<ffffffffa077a692>] queue_if_no_path+0x72/0xc0 [dm_multipath]
> [<ffffffffa077a6f9>] multipath_presuspend+0x19/0x20 [dm_multipath]
> [<ffffffffa043d34a>] dm_table_presuspend_targets+0x4a/0x60 [dm_mod]
> [<ffffffffa043ad5d>] dm_suspend+0x6d/0x1f0 [dm_mod]
> [<ffffffffa043ff63>] dev_suspend+0x1c3/0x220 [dm_mod]
> [<ffffffffa0440759>] ctl_ioctl+0x269/0x500 [dm_mod]
> [<ffffffffa0440a03>] dm_ctl_ioctl+0x13/0x20 [dm_mod]
> [<ffffffff811a04c0>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x300/0x520
> [<ffffffff811a0721>] SyS_ioctl+0x41/0x80
> [<ffffffff814b84e2>] tracesys+0xd0/0xd5
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
> Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> ---- ----
> lock(&(&m->lock)->rlock);
> lock(&(&q->__queue_lock)->rlock);
> lock(&(&m->lock)->rlock);
> lock(&(&q->__queue_lock)->rlock);
>
> *** DEADLOCK ***
I'm not seeing where q->queue_lock is held before m->lock is taken.
I did find that multipath_ioctl() does _not_ hold m->lock when calling
dm_table_run_md_queue_async() -- the other callers hold m->lock.
Any chance you can see if this patch silences lockdep?
--
drivers/md/dm-mpath.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c b/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
index aa009e8..fa0f6cb 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
@@ -1566,8 +1566,8 @@ static int multipath_ioctl(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned int cmd,
}
if (m->pg_init_required)
__pg_init_all_paths(m);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&m->lock, flags);
dm_table_run_md_queue_async(m->ti->table);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&m->lock, flags);
}
return r ? : __blkdev_driver_ioctl(bdev, mode, cmd, arg);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-07 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-06 9:31 3.15-rc4: circular locking dependency triggered by dm-multipath Bart Van Assche
2014-05-06 13:22 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-05-06 13:46 ` Bart Van Assche
2014-05-07 20:53 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2014-05-08 5:57 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-05-26 11:44 ` Bart Van Assche
2014-05-26 12:10 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-05-26 12:20 ` Bart Van Assche
2014-05-26 12:29 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-05-26 12:44 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-05-26 12:51 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-05-26 14:54 ` Bart Van Assche
2014-05-27 13:22 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-05-27 14:49 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-05-27 16:09 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140507205333.GA29666@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.