From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] vfs: get_next_ino(), support for the uniqueness
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 17:14:31 +0200
Message-ID: <20140522151431.GA25517@lst.de>
References: <1400698140-25853-1-git-send-email-hooanon05g@gmail.com> <1400698140-25853-3-git-send-email-hooanon05g@gmail.com> <20140522115657.GD7999@quack.suse.cz> <7078.1400771001@jrobl> <20140522151253.GH7999@quack.suse.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: "J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05g@gmail.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, adilger@dilger.ca, hch@lst.de,
	dchinner@redhat.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jlbec@evilplan.org,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, hughd@google.com
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:49491 "EHLO newverein.lst.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751088AbaEVPOf (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 22 May 2014 11:14:35 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140522151253.GH7999@quack.suse.cz>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 05:12:53PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
>   Yes, that's why I wrote that if we find that uniqueness of inode numbers
> in tmpfs is needed, then we should probably just make tmpfs add inodes to
> hash list and use iunique(). That would seem like a better solution to me.

Any reason not to just use the ida allocator for inode numbers in tmpfs?