From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753581AbaE1N4U (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 May 2014 09:56:20 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:57370 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752177AbaE1N4T (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 May 2014 09:56:19 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 15:56:17 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Vince Weaver Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Cyrill Gorcunov Subject: Re: perf_fuzzer crash on pentium 4 Message-ID: <20140528135617.GA25750@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > So just to be difficult I fired up the perf_fuzzer on a Pentium 4 machine. > > It crashes more or less instantly (sorry for the line wrapping, > just got the serial console hooked up and don't have minicom configured > right yet). > > this is 3.15-rc4 with the anti-memory corruption patch applied. > > [ 67.872274] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000004 > [ 67.876146] IP: [] p4_pmu_schedule_events+0xa5/0x331 Pentium 4 's were not 64bit, were they? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html