From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753998AbaE1OGh (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 May 2014 10:06:37 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-f44.google.com ([209.85.215.44]:58446 "EHLO mail-la0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753198AbaE1OGf (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 May 2014 10:06:35 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 18:06:32 +0400 From: Cyrill Gorcunov To: Pavel Machek Cc: Vince Weaver , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: perf_fuzzer crash on pentium 4 Message-ID: <20140528140632.GH2570@moon> References: <20140528135617.GA25750@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140528135617.GA25750@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 03:56:17PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > So just to be difficult I fired up the perf_fuzzer on a Pentium 4 machine. > > > > It crashes more or less instantly (sorry for the line wrapping, > > just got the serial console hooked up and don't have minicom configured > > right yet). > > > > this is 3.15-rc4 with the anti-memory corruption patch applied. > > > > [ 67.872274] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000004 > > [ 67.876146] IP: [] p4_pmu_schedule_events+0xa5/0x331 > > Pentium 4 's were not 64bit, were they? Not all, but there were 64bit varians (Xeons iirc).