From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754404AbaE1Pnr (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 May 2014 11:43:47 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-f52.google.com ([209.85.215.52]:62958 "EHLO mail-la0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752358AbaE1Pnq (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 May 2014 11:43:46 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 19:43:43 +0400 From: Cyrill Gorcunov To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Pavel Machek , Vince Weaver , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: perf_fuzzer crash on pentium 4 Message-ID: <20140528154343.GI2570@moon> References: <20140528135617.GA25750@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> <20140528140632.GH2570@moon> <20140528152011.GX11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140528152011.GX11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 05:20:11PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > > > Pentium 4 's were not 64bit, were they? > > > > Not all, but there were 64bit varians (Xeons iirc). > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_d > > consumer netburst chip with x86_64. Yeah, thanks.