All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Cc: feng.wu@intel.com, ufimtseva@gmail.com, JBeulich@suse.com,
	daniel.kiper@oracle.com, zoltan.kiss@citrix.com,
	avanzini.arianna@gmail.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	olaf@aepfle.de, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com,
	julien.grall@linaro.org, Paul.Durrant@citrix.com, msw@amazon.com,
	boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, andrew.bennieston@citrix.com,
	Wei.Liu2@citrix.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
	Kelly.Zytaruk@amd.com, dslutz@verizon.com,
	david.vrabel@citrix.com, tiejun.chen@intel.com,
	malcolm.crossley@citrix.com
Subject: Re: Xen 4.5 development update
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 11:46:56 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140528154656.GJ10363@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5385B407.40503@citrix.com>

On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:01:43AM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On 27/05/14 19:06, konrad.wilk@oracle.com wrote:
> > Below is a summary of the projects / features being worked on for the 4.5
> > time frame that I had been gathering.
> > 
> > It is not complete! I would like folks input if I had missed something
> > or screwed up. Will also talk at Xen Hackahon about this and take a look
> > at  http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_Roadmap/4.4 to see which of the
> > items there should move over.
> > 
> > The tentative feature freeze is scheduled for September 10th,
> > which is months away.  With that in mind, I think it's time to take
> > stock of the development, so we know whether to ask for more help or divert
> > resources.
> > 
> > For items involving code hosted on the Xen.org site (including qemu-xen),
> > that means a likelihood of having the feature code-complete and mostly
> > working by the feature freeze.  (It's OK if there are still bugs to be
> > worked out.)  For items in Linux, I think it would mean having items on track
> > to make it into the kernel released just after the scheduled 4.5 time frame.
> > Not sure what that means for libvirt. :-)
> > 
> > For items involving code hosted on the Xen.org site (including qemu-xen),
> > that means a likelihood of having the feature code-complete and mostly
> > working by the feature freeze.  (It's OK if there are still bugs to be
> > worked out.)  For items in Linux, I think it would mean having items on track
> > to make it into the kernel released just after the scheduled 4.5 time frame.
> > Not sure what that means for libvirt. :-)
> > 
> > = Timeline =
> > 
> > We are planning on a 9-month release cycle.  Based on that, below are
> > our estimated dates:
> > * Feature Freeze: 10th September 2014
> > * First RC: 10th October
> > * Release: 10th December 2014
> > 
> > The RCs and release will of course depend on stability and bugs, and
> > will therefore be fairly unpredictable.  The feature freeze may be
> > slipped for especially important features which are near completion.
> > 
> > = Prognosis =
> 
> [...]
> 
> > * Roger Pau Monné  Prognosis:   100 %
> >     Xen PVH dom0
> >     PVH FreeBSD dom0
> 
> Hello Konrad,

Hey!
> 
> Thanks for doing this list, I certainly think Xen PVH Dom0 will make it
> to 4.5, most patches are already committed, and the remaining ones are
> already reviewed AFAIK. So very soon we will have PVH Dom0 available on
> Intel HW with EPT support, which brings the next question, what do we
> think we should work on after that? There are a bunch of things still
> pending for PVH, and I'm not sure we will be able to get all them done
> for 4.5, here's a list on top of my head:
> 
>  - PCI passthrough for DomU.
>  - Migration of PVH DomUs.
>  - Migration of guests from a PVH Dom0.
>  - AMD hardware support.
>  - PVH working with shadow.
> 
> IMHO, I think the two most important items would be getting PVH working
> on AMD hardware and shadow, but maybe others have different opinions.

I concur. I know that Mukesh had been in the time between reviews eyeballing
the AMD part, but nothing concrete yet.

I would say that the list of interesting/important items could be 
in this order:

  - Migration of PVH DomUs.
  - Migration of guests from a PVH Dom0.
  - AMD hardware support (Mukesh).
  - PVH working with shadow.
  - PCI passthrough for DomU.

But that is just my take.

> 
> Roger.
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-28 15:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-27 18:06 Xen 4.5 development update konrad.wilk
2014-05-27 19:18 ` Wei Huang
2014-05-28 11:43   ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-05-28 15:47     ` Julien Grall
2014-05-27 22:45 ` Wei Liu
2014-05-27 23:43 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-05-28 15:41   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
     [not found] ` <CAGU+auv+nJAU9Ys9J15V03t-4r=ScVocomBKEN8dHwUQHTmT0w@mail.gmail.com>
2014-05-27 23:56   ` Aravindh Puthiyaparambil (aravindp)
2014-05-28  7:16     ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-28 18:49       ` Aravindh Puthiyaparambil (aravindp)
2014-05-28 15:42     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-05-28 10:01 ` Roger Pau Monné
2014-05-28 15:46   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2014-05-28 11:35 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-05-29  1:25 ` Xu, Dongxiao
2014-05-30 10:09 ` Don Slutz
2014-05-30 13:57   ` Zytaruk, Kelly
2014-05-30 14:09     ` Don Slutz
2014-06-04 13:20 ` Lars Kurth
2014-06-04 13:50   ` Zytaruk, Kelly
2014-06-04 14:41     ` Sander Eikelenboom
2014-06-18 20:22 konrad.wilk
2014-06-18 20:36 ` Julien Grall
2014-06-18 20:47 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-06-19  7:56   ` Paul Durrant
2014-06-18 21:24 ` Aravindh Puthiyaparambil (aravindp)
2014-06-18 21:56 ` Roy Franz
2014-06-19  4:05 ` Vijay Kilari
2014-06-19 10:23 ` Wei Liu
2014-06-19 12:05 ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-06-19 13:24 ` Don Slutz
2014-06-19 16:37   ` Jan Beulich
2014-06-19 16:46     ` Andrew Cooper
2014-06-19 14:15 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-06-20  8:50 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-06-23 14:25 ` Lars Kurth
2014-06-26 14:10 ` Ian Campbell
2014-06-27 14:55   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-01 16:43 konrad.wilk
2014-07-02 11:33 ` George Dunlap
2014-07-02 12:23   ` Jan Beulich
2014-07-11  6:51 ` Dario Faggioli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140528154656.GJ10363@phenom.dumpdata.com \
    --to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=Kelly.Zytaruk@amd.com \
    --cc=Paul.Durrant@citrix.com \
    --cc=Wei.Liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=andrew.bennieston@citrix.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=avanzini.arianna@gmail.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=daniel.kiper@oracle.com \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=dslutz@verizon.com \
    --cc=feng.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=julien.grall@linaro.org \
    --cc=malcolm.crossley@citrix.com \
    --cc=msw@amazon.com \
    --cc=olaf@aepfle.de \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=tiejun.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=ufimtseva@gmail.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    --cc=zoltan.kiss@citrix.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.