All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: George Duffield <forumscollective@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Understanding raid array status: Active vs Clean
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 15:16:58 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140529151658.3bfc97e5@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG__1a4MRV6gJL38XLAurtoSiD3rLBTmWpcS5HYvPpSfPR88UQ@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2770 bytes --]

On Mon, 26 May 2014 22:08:40 +0200 George Duffield
<forumscollective@gmail.com> wrote:

> I recently created a raid 5 array under Arch Linux running on a HP
> Microserver using pretty much the same topography as I do under Ubuntu
> Server.  The creation process went fine and the array is accessible,
> however, from the outset it's only ever reported status as Active
> rather than Clean.
> 
> After creating the array, watch -d cat /proc/mdstat returned:
> 
> Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
> md0 : active raid5 sda1[0] sdc1[2] sde1[5] sdb1[1] sdd1[3]
>       11720536064 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 512k chunk, algorithm 2
> [5/5] [UUUUU]
>       bitmap: 2/22 pages [8KB], 65536KB chunk
> 
> unused devices: <none>
> 
> which to me pretty much looks like the array sync completed successfully.
> 
> I then updated the config file, assembled the array and formatted it using:
> mdadm --detail --scan >> /etc/mdadm.conf
> mdadm --assemble --scan
> mkfs.ext4 -v -L offsitestorage -b 4096 -E stride=128,stripe-width=512 /dev/md0
> 
> mdadm --detail /dev/md0 returns:
> 
> /dev/md0:
>         Version : 1.2
>   Creation Time : Thu Apr 17 01:13:52 2014
>      Raid Level : raid5
>      Array Size : 11720536064 (11177.57 GiB 12001.83 GB)
>   Used Dev Size : 2930134016 (2794.39 GiB 3000.46 GB)
>    Raid Devices : 5
>   Total Devices : 5
>     Persistence : Superblock is persistent
> 
>   Intent Bitmap : Internal
> 
>     Update Time : Thu Apr 17 18:55:01 2014
>           State : active
>  Active Devices : 5
> Working Devices : 5
>  Failed Devices : 0
>   Spare Devices : 0
> 
>          Layout : left-symmetric
>      Chunk Size : 512K
> 
>            Name : audioliboffsite:0  (local to host audioliboffsite)
>            UUID : aba348c6:8dc7b4a7:4e282ab5:40431aff
>          Events : 11306
> 
>     Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
>        0       8        1        0      active sync   /dev/sda1
>        1       8       17        1      active sync   /dev/sdb1
>        2       8       33        2      active sync   /dev/sdc1
>        3       8       49        3      active sync   /dev/sdd1
>        5       8       65        4      active sync   /dev/sde1
> 
> So, I'm now left wondering why the state of the array isn't "clean"?
> Is it normal for arrays to show a state of "active" instead of clean
> under Arch - is it simply a matter of Arch is packaged with a more
> recent version of mdadm than Ubuntu Server?

I doubt there is a difference between Ubuntu and Arch here.

The array should show "active" in "mdadm --detail" output for 200ms after the
last write, and then switch to 'clean'.
So if you are writing every 100ms, it will always say "active".

NeilBrown

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-05-29  5:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-26 20:08 Understanding raid array status: Active vs Clean George Duffield
2014-05-28 18:05 ` George Duffield
2014-05-29  5:16 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2014-05-29  5:52   ` forumscollective
2014-05-29  6:06     ` NeilBrown
2014-06-17 14:31       ` George Duffield
2014-06-18 13:25         ` George Duffield
2014-06-18 14:31           ` George Duffield
2014-06-18 15:03           ` Robin Hill
2014-06-18 15:57             ` George Duffield
2014-06-18 16:04               ` George Duffield
2014-06-22 14:32                 ` George Duffield
2014-06-23  2:01                   ` NeilBrown
2014-06-28  3:01                     ` George Duffield
2014-06-28  5:29                       ` NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140529151658.3bfc97e5@notabene.brown \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=forumscollective@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.