From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 23:40:25 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: removes all usage of gpiochip_remove retval Message-Id: <20140530094025.3b78301e@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Sig_/852XE2D+8ii.R+aAPw7pJ16" List-Id: References: <1401400492-26175-1-git-send-email-berthe.ab@gmail.com> <5387B149.20408@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org --Sig_/852XE2D+8ii.R+aAPw7pJ16 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi abdoulaye, On Fri, 30 May 2014 01:16:22 +0200 abdoulaye berthe w= rote: > > The aim of this patch is to make gpiochip_remove() behavior consistent, > especially when issuing a remove request while the chipio chip is > still requested. A patch has been submitted to change the return value of > gpiochip_remove() from int to void. This one updates users of the return > value: Then you need to keep these two patch in a series with this one first to make sure that the other patch is not applied without this one. And you should add the above explanation to the changelog for this patch. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au --Sig_/852XE2D+8ii.R+aAPw7pJ16 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTh8VuAAoJEMDTa8Ir7ZwV8iEQAICWaN/UMPsdzewqsMiXXSMh C5svkPpUj+qDUSm6Z89xsBlSrNn5iaa06uiZllN8KLoLbhGpZ5xdGqmMalys33zc Bh2lJNCtozIbI1fMW63+W94wMtWNSnUAbX4szSpxbbaZQ3ig9ixXegji8nvONTqw QWNjGORnMPvzrCsTrv8/hNYlmeT/9WZwAwVLr9++ldM0fow/SfF251WvmNjheAcq 2YCd1vEk7ZZ9aFDr463CKP3eeTKDtWaSrdoXLdIvs627tRtfhSuqQF1q6d8B1Vbk HR9xx3bANosgA/Fa7rHcWxw8lLr5EDXeaHJieT0I05kXPM1rSIh9tTGAeXivG/LH j+FWHe7P3v2qN+mvgqRHIndi1axUhm4ZbqG3Wcg8uAV+rGxemlmkZMWzdMPwzcRA YJKTVoc+LbLp4Yb1HpZ4hYbKvxu7iEf8OQJsb9bY3lnm8Rnax4VhQtn15aKn2fLr b8xSfM9iGeL1bgEyh5pK4BVgE1+N7Z/7qGfD95EAT9v5cX7di9y+eU8zXb0fmXRh V1rV2n9RfrbH3wE8DoR4yC2SeDcQl5F/CwII/zHkymzWTgGvpN4mhk06q0CPhxxO nZD317b7OuLQbDbZJ+o/92/XMlOt6Sanno1I27C19ahUMynJAo32O+xHIDdv5AKI Dom8qI4Ex3DKkwqflJzw =RG4V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/852XE2D+8ii.R+aAPw7pJ16-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:55074 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753310AbaE2Xkf (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2014 19:40:35 -0400 Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 09:40:25 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: abdoulaye berthe Cc: David Daney , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Alexandre Courbot , patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Linus Walleij , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , spear-devel@list.st.com, linux-samsungsoc@vger.kernel.org, "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, m@bues.ch, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: removes all usage of gpiochip_remove retval Message-ID: <20140530094025.3b78301e@canb.auug.org.au> (sfid-20140530_014044_340331_D3C60C85) In-Reply-To: References: <1401400492-26175-1-git-send-email-berthe.ab@gmail.com> <5387B149.20408@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/852XE2D+8ii.R+aAPw7pJ16"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --Sig_/852XE2D+8ii.R+aAPw7pJ16 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi abdoulaye, On Fri, 30 May 2014 01:16:22 +0200 abdoulaye berthe w= rote: > > The aim of this patch is to make gpiochip_remove() behavior consistent, > especially when issuing a remove request while the chipio chip is > still requested. A patch has been submitted to change the return value of > gpiochip_remove() from int to void. This one updates users of the return > value: Then you need to keep these two patch in a series with this one first to make sure that the other patch is not applied without this one. And you should add the above explanation to the changelog for this patch. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au --Sig_/852XE2D+8ii.R+aAPw7pJ16 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTh8VuAAoJEMDTa8Ir7ZwV8iEQAICWaN/UMPsdzewqsMiXXSMh C5svkPpUj+qDUSm6Z89xsBlSrNn5iaa06uiZllN8KLoLbhGpZ5xdGqmMalys33zc Bh2lJNCtozIbI1fMW63+W94wMtWNSnUAbX4szSpxbbaZQ3ig9ixXegji8nvONTqw QWNjGORnMPvzrCsTrv8/hNYlmeT/9WZwAwVLr9++ldM0fow/SfF251WvmNjheAcq 2YCd1vEk7ZZ9aFDr463CKP3eeTKDtWaSrdoXLdIvs627tRtfhSuqQF1q6d8B1Vbk HR9xx3bANosgA/Fa7rHcWxw8lLr5EDXeaHJieT0I05kXPM1rSIh9tTGAeXivG/LH j+FWHe7P3v2qN+mvgqRHIndi1axUhm4ZbqG3Wcg8uAV+rGxemlmkZMWzdMPwzcRA YJKTVoc+LbLp4Yb1HpZ4hYbKvxu7iEf8OQJsb9bY3lnm8Rnax4VhQtn15aKn2fLr b8xSfM9iGeL1bgEyh5pK4BVgE1+N7Z/7qGfD95EAT9v5cX7di9y+eU8zXb0fmXRh V1rV2n9RfrbH3wE8DoR4yC2SeDcQl5F/CwII/zHkymzWTgGvpN4mhk06q0CPhxxO nZD317b7OuLQbDbZJ+o/92/XMlOt6Sanno1I27C19ahUMynJAo32O+xHIDdv5AKI Dom8qI4Ex3DKkwqflJzw =RG4V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/852XE2D+8ii.R+aAPw7pJ16-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [103.22.144.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC38D1A0611 for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 09:40:31 +1000 (EST) Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 09:40:25 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: abdoulaye berthe Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: removes all usage of gpiochip_remove retval Message-ID: <20140530094025.3b78301e@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: References: <1401400492-26175-1-git-send-email-berthe.ab@gmail.com> <5387B149.20408@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/852XE2D+8ii.R+aAPw7pJ16"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Alexandre Courbot , spear-devel@list.st.com, m@bues.ch, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Linus Walleij , patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-samsungsoc@vger.kernel.org, "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, David Daney , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --Sig_/852XE2D+8ii.R+aAPw7pJ16 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi abdoulaye, On Fri, 30 May 2014 01:16:22 +0200 abdoulaye berthe w= rote: > > The aim of this patch is to make gpiochip_remove() behavior consistent, > especially when issuing a remove request while the chipio chip is > still requested. A patch has been submitted to change the return value of > gpiochip_remove() from int to void. This one updates users of the return > value: Then you need to keep these two patch in a series with this one first to make sure that the other patch is not applied without this one. And you should add the above explanation to the changelog for this patch. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au --Sig_/852XE2D+8ii.R+aAPw7pJ16 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTh8VuAAoJEMDTa8Ir7ZwV8iEQAICWaN/UMPsdzewqsMiXXSMh C5svkPpUj+qDUSm6Z89xsBlSrNn5iaa06uiZllN8KLoLbhGpZ5xdGqmMalys33zc Bh2lJNCtozIbI1fMW63+W94wMtWNSnUAbX4szSpxbbaZQ3ig9ixXegji8nvONTqw QWNjGORnMPvzrCsTrv8/hNYlmeT/9WZwAwVLr9++ldM0fow/SfF251WvmNjheAcq 2YCd1vEk7ZZ9aFDr463CKP3eeTKDtWaSrdoXLdIvs627tRtfhSuqQF1q6d8B1Vbk HR9xx3bANosgA/Fa7rHcWxw8lLr5EDXeaHJieT0I05kXPM1rSIh9tTGAeXivG/LH j+FWHe7P3v2qN+mvgqRHIndi1axUhm4ZbqG3Wcg8uAV+rGxemlmkZMWzdMPwzcRA YJKTVoc+LbLp4Yb1HpZ4hYbKvxu7iEf8OQJsb9bY3lnm8Rnax4VhQtn15aKn2fLr b8xSfM9iGeL1bgEyh5pK4BVgE1+N7Z/7qGfD95EAT9v5cX7di9y+eU8zXb0fmXRh V1rV2n9RfrbH3wE8DoR4yC2SeDcQl5F/CwII/zHkymzWTgGvpN4mhk06q0CPhxxO nZD317b7OuLQbDbZJ+o/92/XMlOt6Sanno1I27C19ahUMynJAo32O+xHIDdv5AKI Dom8qI4Ex3DKkwqflJzw =RG4V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/852XE2D+8ii.R+aAPw7pJ16-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sfr@canb.auug.org.au (Stephen Rothwell) Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 09:40:25 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] gpio: removes all usage of gpiochip_remove retval In-Reply-To: References: <1401400492-26175-1-git-send-email-berthe.ab@gmail.com> <5387B149.20408@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20140530094025.3b78301e@canb.auug.org.au> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi abdoulaye, On Fri, 30 May 2014 01:16:22 +0200 abdoulaye berthe wrote: > > The aim of this patch is to make gpiochip_remove() behavior consistent, > especially when issuing a remove request while the chipio chip is > still requested. A patch has been submitted to change the return value of > gpiochip_remove() from int to void. This one updates users of the return > value: Then you need to keep these two patch in a series with this one first to make sure that the other patch is not applied without this one. And you should add the above explanation to the changelog for this patch. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr at canb.auug.org.au -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: not available URL: