On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 02:53:21PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 01:11:10PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Unfortunately even with the latest bits from you the breakage I 
> > reported weeks ago is not resolved:
> > 
> > In file included from include/linux/spinlock_types.h:15:0,
> >                  from kernel/bounds.c:14:
> > include/linux/spinlock_types_up.h:19:3: error: conflicting types for ‘arch_spinlock_t’
> > In file included from /home/mingo/linux/linux2/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h:329:0,
> >                  from /home/mingo/linux/linux2/arch/x86/include/asm/ptrace.h:64,
> >                  from /home/mingo/linux/linux2/arch/x86/include/asm/alternative.h:8,
> >                  from /home/mingo/linux/linux2/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:16,
> >                  from include/linux/bitops.h:33,
> >                  from include/linux/kernel.h:10,
> >                  from include/asm-generic/bug.h:13,
> >                  from /home/mingo/linux/linux2/arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h:35,
> >                  from include/linux/bug.h:4,
> >                  from include/linux/page-flags.h:9,
> >                  from kernel/bounds.c:9:
> 
> OK, That's UP + paravirt. The one I fixed a few weeks ago was SMP +
> paravirt.
> 
> Lemme go kick some headers.

OK, I got {SMP,UP}x{PARAVIRT,!PARAVIRT} all building now, /me crosses
fingers. Hateful headers them.