From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DE377F3F for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 04:40:24 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DBCFAC0B7 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 02:40:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id S5GntvkssNZwWPvH (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 02:40:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 02:40:20 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfsprogs: indicate default mount options in xfs.5 manpage Message-ID: <20140616094020.GC26172@infradead.org> References: <5398B5ED.6030703@redhat.com> <5398B649.6020600@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5398B649.6020600@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Eric Sandeen , Karel Zak , xfs-oss On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 03:04:25PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Not every pair of mount options indicated which was the > default, so add those. Looks good, but why have this separate from the previous patch? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs