From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter De Schrijver Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] clk: tegra: Enable hardware control of SATA PLL Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 12:59:13 +0300 Message-ID: <20140617095913.GE3407@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com> References: <1401881559-18469-1-git-send-email-mperttunen@nvidia.com> <1401881559-18469-5-git-send-email-mperttunen@nvidia.com> <539F665E.3060007@wwwdotorg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <539F665E.3060007@wwwdotorg.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Warren Cc: Mikko Perttunen , "thierry.reding@gmail.com" , "tj@kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:49:18PM +0200, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 06/04/2014 05:32 AM, Mikko Perttunen wrote: > > This makes the SATA PLL be controlled by hardware instead of software. > > This is required for working SATA support. > > Peter, could you please take patches 4 and 5 through the clock tree. As > far as I can tell, there's no compile-time dependency in the clock > patches, so they can go through a different tree to the rest of the > series without issue. These 2 patches look fine to me, so consider them: > > Acked-by: Stephen Warren Ok. Will do. Cheers, Peter. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754158AbaFQJ7U (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2014 05:59:20 -0400 Received: from hqemgate16.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.65]:8224 "EHLO hqemgate16.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751147AbaFQJ7S (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2014 05:59:18 -0400 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqnvupgp07.nvidia.com on Tue, 17 Jun 2014 02:50:01 -0700 Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 12:59:13 +0300 From: Peter De Schrijver To: Stephen Warren CC: Mikko Perttunen , "thierry.reding@gmail.com" , "tj@kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] clk: tegra: Enable hardware control of SATA PLL Message-ID: <20140617095913.GE3407@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com> References: <1401881559-18469-1-git-send-email-mperttunen@nvidia.com> <1401881559-18469-5-git-send-email-mperttunen@nvidia.com> <539F665E.3060007@wwwdotorg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <539F665E.3060007@wwwdotorg.org> X-NVConfidentiality: public User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:49:18PM +0200, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 06/04/2014 05:32 AM, Mikko Perttunen wrote: > > This makes the SATA PLL be controlled by hardware instead of software. > > This is required for working SATA support. > > Peter, could you please take patches 4 and 5 through the clock tree. As > far as I can tell, there's no compile-time dependency in the clock > patches, so they can go through a different tree to the rest of the > series without issue. These 2 patches look fine to me, so consider them: > > Acked-by: Stephen Warren Ok. Will do. Cheers, Peter. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pdeschrijver@nvidia.com (Peter De Schrijver) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 12:59:13 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 4/9] clk: tegra: Enable hardware control of SATA PLL In-Reply-To: <539F665E.3060007@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1401881559-18469-1-git-send-email-mperttunen@nvidia.com> <1401881559-18469-5-git-send-email-mperttunen@nvidia.com> <539F665E.3060007@wwwdotorg.org> Message-ID: <20140617095913.GE3407@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:49:18PM +0200, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 06/04/2014 05:32 AM, Mikko Perttunen wrote: > > This makes the SATA PLL be controlled by hardware instead of software. > > This is required for working SATA support. > > Peter, could you please take patches 4 and 5 through the clock tree. As > far as I can tell, there's no compile-time dependency in the clock > patches, so they can go through a different tree to the rest of the > series without issue. These 2 patches look fine to me, so consider them: > > Acked-by: Stephen Warren Ok. Will do. Cheers, Peter.