From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Horman Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 09:26:09 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/14] ARM: shmobile: Mark all SoCs in shmobile as CPUFreq, capable Message-Id: <20140625092609.GC7496@verge.net.au> List-Id: References: <6596e97e054647fecb016ecb7e1935aa2b7db954.1403681315.git.horms+renesas@verge.net.au> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 02:26:24PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Simon Horman > wrote: > > From: Benoit Cousson > > > > Mark all SoCs in shmobile as CPUFreq capable > > on multiplatform build only. > > > > Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson > > [gaku.inami.xw@bp.renesas.com: Move the definition of cpufreq capable] > > Signed-off-by: Gaku Inami > > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman > > --- > > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/Kconfig | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/Kconfig > > index dbd954e..c32fa7c 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/Kconfig > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/Kconfig > > @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ config ARCH_SHMOBILE_MULTI > > select NO_IOPORT_MAP > > select PINCTRL > > select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB > > + select ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ > > + select ARCH_HAS_OPP > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/2/714 > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/356780/ I believe this patch was queued up before those patches hit Linus's tree. In the case of ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ, a subsequent patch in this pull-request, "ARM: shmobile: Remove ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ config for shmobile", removes it. Inami-san, could you see about making a patch to remove ARCH_HAS_OPP too? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: horms@verge.net.au (Simon Horman) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 18:26:09 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 05/14] ARM: shmobile: Mark all SoCs in shmobile as CPUFreq, capable In-Reply-To: References: <6596e97e054647fecb016ecb7e1935aa2b7db954.1403681315.git.horms+renesas@verge.net.au> Message-ID: <20140625092609.GC7496@verge.net.au> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 02:26:24PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Simon Horman > wrote: > > From: Benoit Cousson > > > > Mark all SoCs in shmobile as CPUFreq capable > > on multiplatform build only. > > > > Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson > > [gaku.inami.xw at bp.renesas.com: Move the definition of cpufreq capable] > > Signed-off-by: Gaku Inami > > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman > > --- > > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/Kconfig | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/Kconfig > > index dbd954e..c32fa7c 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/Kconfig > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/Kconfig > > @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ config ARCH_SHMOBILE_MULTI > > select NO_IOPORT_MAP > > select PINCTRL > > select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB > > + select ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ > > + select ARCH_HAS_OPP > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/2/714 > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/356780/ I believe this patch was queued up before those patches hit Linus's tree. In the case of ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ, a subsequent patch in this pull-request, "ARM: shmobile: Remove ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ config for shmobile", removes it. Inami-san, could you see about making a patch to remove ARCH_HAS_OPP too?