From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from STOEXHUB02.domain01.net (STOEXHUB02.domain01.net [83.145.59.143]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D67CE601A8 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 09:28:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ad.chargestorm.se (213.114.64.43) by stoexhub02.domain01.net (10.12.10.2) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.279.1; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 11:28:21 +0200 Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 11:28:07 +0200 From: Anders Darander To: Paul Eggleton Message-ID: <20140625092807.GA21830@ad.chargestorm.se> Mail-Followup-To: Paul Eggleton , Martin Jansa , "openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org" References: <1b5c27f39444bed435c8c050b2fb6def74a5adb8.1403596416.git.anders@chargestorm.se> <2430004.5QNcodJTid@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2430004.5QNcodJTid@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> X-Accept-Language: sv, en, de X-GPG-Fingerprint: 5AF0 B2E9 78FE 9D75 D110 6F8F 3E31 84D7 920E 938C X-GPG-Key-Id: 0x920E938C X-GPG-Keyserver: hkp://keys.gnupg.net Organization: ChargeStorm AB User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-GFI-SMTP-Submission: 1 Cc: "openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org" Subject: Re: [meta-webserver][PATCH 1/1] webmin: drop allarch X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 09:28:25 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline * Paul Eggleton [140625 09:46]: > On Tuesday 24 June 2014 09:54:12 Anders Darander wrote: > > * runtime dependencies are TUNE_PKGARCH causing do_package_write_* > > task to have different signature for MACHINEs with different > > TUNE_PKGARCH > > -inherit allarch perlnative update-rc.d > > +inherit perlnative update-rc.d > So apart from me being reticent to make this change at all (for reasons that > we've discussed before), Yes, I'm well aware of those discussions. I was actually thinking about CC:ing you on my reply to Martin, after he suggested something like this change. > there is another issue - allarch.bbclass does more than just setting > PACKAGE_ARCH, it also disables certain other functionality such as > debug symbol splitting which is superfluous for these kinds of > recipes; in my testing when I originally wrote the webmin recipe this > significantly reduced the time required to build the recipe. We can't > just drop this inherit without regard to that. (I'm sure the same > applies elsewhere, it's just that the size of webmin makes the impact > significant.) I'm all for saving time! (And I'm not personally concerned by this issue, as I'm currently only using webmin in a build tree for a signle machine). Though, to get back to Martin Jansa's issue; if there isn't already an enhancment request file to the Yocto bugzilla, maybe it's time to file one regarding the possibillity of having an allarch package RDEPENDS/RRECOMMNEND a package with an ARCH or MACHINE tune... Paul, what do you think about the feasibility of finding such a solution? Cheers, Anders -- Anders Darander ChargeStorm AB / eStorm AB