From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Horman Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 11:38:53 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/14] ARM: shmobile: Mark all SoCs in shmobile as CPUFreq, capable Message-Id: <20140625113849.GA7205@verge.net.au> List-Id: References: <6596e97e054647fecb016ecb7e1935aa2b7db954.1403681315.git.horms+renesas@verge.net.au> <20140625092609.GC7496@verge.net.au> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 03:00:08PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 25 June 2014 14:56, Simon Horman wrote: > > In the case of ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ, a subsequent patch in > > this pull-request, "ARM: shmobile: Remove ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ config for shmobile", > > removes it. > > Hmm.. I fail to see why you are adding it in the first place then ? Because it seemed to be right thing to do when the patch was written and accepted. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: horms@verge.net.au (Simon Horman) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 20:38:53 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 05/14] ARM: shmobile: Mark all SoCs in shmobile as CPUFreq, capable In-Reply-To: References: <6596e97e054647fecb016ecb7e1935aa2b7db954.1403681315.git.horms+renesas@verge.net.au> <20140625092609.GC7496@verge.net.au> Message-ID: <20140625113849.GA7205@verge.net.au> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 03:00:08PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 25 June 2014 14:56, Simon Horman wrote: > > In the case of ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ, a subsequent patch in > > this pull-request, "ARM: shmobile: Remove ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ config for shmobile", > > removes it. > > Hmm.. I fail to see why you are adding it in the first place then ? Because it seemed to be right thing to do when the patch was written and accepted.