From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752085AbaGGIjB (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2014 04:39:01 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f45.google.com ([74.125.82.45]:54647 "EHLO mail-wg0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751383AbaGGIi7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2014 04:38:59 -0400 Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 10:39:08 +0200 From: Daniel Vetter To: Jiri Kosina Cc: Pavel Machek , Daniel Vetter , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux-pm mailing list , kernel list , Chris Wilson , intel-gfx Subject: Re: 3.15-rc: regression in suspend Message-ID: <20140707083908.GE5821@phenom.ffwll.local> Mail-Followup-To: Jiri Kosina , Pavel Machek , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux-pm mailing list , kernel list , Chris Wilson , intel-gfx References: <20140514182046.GA13342@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> <20140607120614.GB5309@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> <20140607231124.GA3611@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> <20140609102328.GA25332@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> <20140625223522.GA5923@xo-6d-61-c0.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: Linux phenom 3.15.0-rc3+ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 03:37:16PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jun 2014, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Ok, so I have set up machines for ktest / autobisect, and found out that > > 3.16-rc1 no longer has that problem. Oh well, bisect would not be fun, > > anyway... > > I am still seeing the problem with 3.16-rc2. I'm confused now. Is the bisect result commit 773875bfb6737982903c42d1ee88cf60af80089c Author: Daniel Vetter Date: Mon Jan 27 10:00:30 2014 +0100 drm/i915: Don't set the 8to6 dither flag when not scaling now the culprit or not? Or do we have 2 different bugs at hand here? -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Vetter Subject: Re: 3.15-rc: regression in suspend Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 10:39:08 +0200 Message-ID: <20140707083908.GE5821@phenom.ffwll.local> References: <20140514182046.GA13342@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> <20140607120614.GB5309@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> <20140607231124.GA3611@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> <20140609102328.GA25332@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> <20140625223522.GA5923@xo-6d-61-c0.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com (mail-wi0-f170.google.com [209.85.212.170]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F100B6E290 for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 01:38:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id cc10so14569716wib.1 for ; Mon, 07 Jul 2014 01:38:58 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" To: Jiri Kosina Cc: Linux-pm mailing list , Daniel Vetter , intel-gfx , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , kernel list , Pavel Machek List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 03:37:16PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jun 2014, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Ok, so I have set up machines for ktest / autobisect, and found out that > > 3.16-rc1 no longer has that problem. Oh well, bisect would not be fun, > > anyway... > > I am still seeing the problem with 3.16-rc2. I'm confused now. Is the bisect result commit 773875bfb6737982903c42d1ee88cf60af80089c Author: Daniel Vetter Date: Mon Jan 27 10:00:30 2014 +0100 drm/i915: Don't set the 8to6 dither flag when not scaling now the culprit or not? Or do we have 2 different bugs at hand here? -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch