All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>, Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Check for nested events if there is an injectable interrupt
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 17:26:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140708092628.GA19860@kernel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53BBA523.4080006@redhat.com>

On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 10:00:35AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>Il 08/07/2014 08:56, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
>>I don't think arch.nmi_pending can flip asynchronously, only in the
>>context of the VCPU thread - in contrast to pending IRQ states.
>
>Right, only nmi_queued is changed from other threads.  /me should
>really look at the code instead of going from memory.
>
>>>Jan, what do you think?  Can you run Jailhouse through this patch?
>>
>>Jailhouse seems fine with it, and it resolves the lockup of nested KVM
>>here as well.
>
>Thinking more about it, I think this is the right fix.  Not setting
>KVM_REQ_EVENT in some cases can be an optimization, but it's not
>necessary.  Definitely there are other cases in which KVM_REQ_EVENT
>is set even though no event is pending---most notably during
>emulation of invalid guest state.

Anyway, 

Reviewed-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>

>
>Paolo

      reply	other threads:[~2014-07-08  9:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-08  4:30 [PATCH] KVM: x86: Check for nested events if there is an injectable interrupt Bandan Das
2014-07-08  5:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-08  6:56   ` Jan Kiszka
2014-07-08  8:00     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-08  9:26       ` Wanpeng Li [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140708092628.GA19860@kernel \
    --to=wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bsd@redhat.com \
    --cc=gleb@kernel.org \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.