From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: [PATCH] librte_pmd_packet: add PMD for AF_PACKET-based virtual devices Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 13:35:30 -0400 Message-ID: <20140714173529.GF27848@tuxdriver.com> References: <1405024369-30058-1-git-send-email-linville@tuxdriver.com> <20140711225108.GA9381@sivswdev02.ir.intel.com> <20140714134832.GD27848@tuxdriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org To: Bruce Richardson Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140714134832.GD27848-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 09:48:33AM -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 11:51:08PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 04:32:49PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > > > This is a Linux-specific virtual PMD driver backed by an AF_PACKET > > I'm just trying this out now on a Fedora 20 machine, using kernel > > 3.14.9-200.fc20.x86_64. However, while the first packet PMD port > > initializes correctly, the subsequent ones do not. Please see output > > from my test run below. All four ports are of the same type. > > Thanks I'll check into it. I'm not sure why you would only be able > to set the fanout on the first port... It looks like I lost a patch in the prep for posting. As a result, I was using the same fanout group ID between different interfaces... :-( I'll post a V2 in a bit...thanks! John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org might be all we have. Be ready.