All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, jg1.han@samsung.com,
	mohit.kumar@st.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	grant.likely@linaro.org,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>,
	Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] PCI: designware: Configuration space should be specified in 'reg'
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:53:26 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140722205326.GA25432@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1405587643-13808-2-git-send-email-kishon@ti.com>

On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 02:30:40PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> The configuration address space has so far been specified in *ranges*,
> however it should be specified in *reg* making it a platform MEM resource.
> Hence used 'platform_get_resource_*' API to get configuration address
> space in the designware driver.
> 
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
> Acked-by: Mohit Kumar <mohit.kumar@st.com>
> Acked-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/pci/designware-pcie.txt    |    4 ++++
>  drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c                 |   17 +++++++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/designware-pcie.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/designware-pcie.txt
> index d0d15ee..ed0d9b9 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/designware-pcie.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/designware-pcie.txt
> @@ -2,6 +2,10 @@
>  
>  Required properties:
>  - compatible: should contain "snps,dw-pcie" to identify the core.
> +- reg: Should contain the configuration address space.
> +- reg-names: Must be "config" for the PCIe configuration space.
> +    (The old way of getting the configuration address space from "ranges"
> +    is deprecated and should be avoided.)

I'm not a devicetree person, so please excuse my floundering here.
There doesn't seem to be consistent usage of "reg" or "reg-names".
Here's what I found in the existing Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci
stuff:

  83xx-512x-pci.txt
    - reg: should contain two address length tuples
	The first is for the internal pci bridge registers
	The second is for the pci config space access registers

  fsl,imx6q-pcie.txt
    - reg: base addresse and length of the pcie controller

  host-generic-pci.txt
    - reg            : The Configuration Space base address and size, as accessed
		       from the parent bus.

  nvidia,tegra20-pcie.txt
    - reg: A list of physical base address and length for each set of controller
      registers. Must contain an entry for each entry in the reg-names property.
    - reg-names: Must include the following entries:
      "pads": PADS registers
      "afi": AFI registers
      "cs": configuration space region

  pci-rcar-gen2.txt
    - reg:  A list of physical regions to access the device: the first is
	    the operational registers for the OHCI/EHCI controllers and the
	    second is for the bridge configuration and control registers.

  ralink,rt3883-pci.txt
     - reg: specifies the physical base address of the controller and
       the length of the memory mapped region.

  rcar-pci.txt
    - reg: base address and length of the pcie controller registers.

  samsung,exynos5440-pcie.txt
    - reg: base addresses and lengths of the pcie controller,
	  the phy controller, additional register for the phy controller.

  v3-v360epc-pci.txt
    - reg: should contain the base address of the V3 adapter.

So my questions are:

1) Is "reg" the right place for configuration space?  I assume this is
CAM or ECAM.  Only 83xx-512x-pci.txt, host-generic-pci.txt, and
nvidia,tegra20-pcie.txt mention using "reg" for config space; all the
others use "reg" for register space for the PCIe controller itself.

2) Is "config" the correct value for "reg-names"?  Only
nvidia,tegra20-pcie.txt has something similar, and it wants "cs".
Should these be the same?

3) Doesn't this add a revlock (kernels with this patch require a new
device tree that adds "reg" and "reg-names"?  I know both Mohit and
Jingoo acked this [1,2], so I'm just double-checking that this is
expected and desired.

Bjorn

[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/2CC2A0A4A178534D93D5159BF3BCB6619C5F94EFC8@EAPEX1MAIL1.st.com
[2] http://marc.info/?l=linux-pci&m=140482389231290&w=2


>  - #address-cells: set to <3>
>  - #size-cells: set to <2>
>  - device_type: set to "pci"
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> index 1eaf4df..0b7b455 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
>  #include <linux/of_pci.h>
>  #include <linux/pci.h>
>  #include <linux/pci_regs.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/types.h>
>  
>  #include "pcie-designware.h"
> @@ -396,11 +397,23 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops msi_domain_ops = {
>  int __init dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>  {
>  	struct device_node *np = pp->dev->of_node;
> +	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(pp->dev);
>  	struct of_pci_range range;
>  	struct of_pci_range_parser parser;
> +	struct resource *cfg_res;
>  	u32 val;
>  	int i;
>  
> +	cfg_res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "config");
> +	if (cfg_res) {
> +		pp->config.cfg0_size = resource_size(cfg_res)/2;
> +		pp->config.cfg1_size = resource_size(cfg_res)/2;
> +		pp->cfg0_base = cfg_res->start;
> +		pp->cfg1_base = cfg_res->start + pp->config.cfg0_size;
> +	} else {
> +		dev_err(pp->dev, "missing *config* reg space\n");
> +	}
> +
>  	if (of_pci_range_parser_init(&parser, np)) {
>  		dev_err(pp->dev, "missing ranges property\n");
>  		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -433,6 +446,8 @@ int __init dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>  			of_pci_range_to_resource(&range, np, &pp->cfg);
>  			pp->config.cfg0_size = resource_size(&pp->cfg)/2;
>  			pp->config.cfg1_size = resource_size(&pp->cfg)/2;
> +			pp->cfg0_base = pp->cfg.start;
> +			pp->cfg1_base = pp->cfg.start + pp->config.cfg0_size;
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> @@ -445,8 +460,6 @@ int __init dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	pp->cfg0_base = pp->cfg.start;
> -	pp->cfg1_base = pp->cfg.start + pp->config.cfg0_size;
>  	pp->mem_base = pp->mem.start;
>  
>  	pp->va_cfg0_base = devm_ioremap(pp->dev, pp->cfg0_base,
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-22 20:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-17  9:00 [PATCH v3 0/4] dra7: Add PCIe support Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2014-07-17  9:00 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2014-07-17  9:00 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] PCI: designware: Configuration space should be specified in 'reg' Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2014-07-17  9:00   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2014-07-22 20:53   ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2014-07-22 21:11     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-07-17  9:00 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] PCI: designware: use untranslated address while programming ATU Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2014-07-17  9:00   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2014-07-17  9:00 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] Documentation: pci: ti: Add dt binding documentation for PCIe in DRA7xx Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2014-07-17  9:00   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2014-07-17  9:00 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] PCI: host: pcie-dra7xx: add support for pcie-dra7xx controller Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2014-07-17  9:00   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2014-07-22 12:17 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] dra7: Add PCIe support Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2014-07-22 12:17   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2014-07-22 21:33 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-07-22 21:33   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-07-23  4:17   ` Mohit KUMAR DCG
2014-07-23  4:17     ` Mohit KUMAR DCG
2014-07-23  8:25   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2014-07-23  8:25     ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140722205326.GA25432@google.com \
    --to=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
    --cc=jg1.han@samsung.com \
    --cc=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
    --cc=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marex@denx.de \
    --cc=mohit.kumar@st.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.