All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] x86, microcode, intel: total_size is valid only when data_size != 0
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 12:39:05 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140728153905.GB9752@khazad-dum.debian.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140728142640.GB5350@pd.tnic>

On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 04:04:11PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > As far as I can tell, Intel has always filled the reserved fields in the
> > microcode data files with zeros.
> 
> Yes, and this is the statement I was looking for. IF(!) this really
> is the case, then we don't have anything to worry about because new
> kernel with old container will look at ->datasize, see 0 and return
> DEFAULT_UCODE_TOTALSIZE and we're fine.

We're fine AFAICT.

If there's an official microcode update out there that can trigger this
bug, it didn't come from a Linux distro, from Intel's public download site
or from urbanmyth.org.

I've checked 346 unique microcode updates for 189 unique Intel processors,
and none would cause problems.  That test corpus covers processors as old
as cpuid 0x611.  It is used to check iucode-tool for regressions.

> I've updated the patch with your additional explanation.

Thank you!

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-28 15:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-23 20:10 [PATCH 0/8] x86, microcode: cosmetic and minor issue fixes Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-23 20:10 ` [PATCH 1/8] x86, microcode, amd: fix missing static declaration Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-24 10:24   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-23 20:10 ` [PATCH 2/8] x86, microcode, intel: fix missing static declarations Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-24 10:28   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-23 20:10 ` [PATCH 3/8] x86, microcode, intel: fix typos Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-24 10:33   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-23 20:10 ` [PATCH 4/8] x86, microcode, intel: fix missing declaration Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-24 11:01   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-24 14:27     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-24 18:23   ` [PATCH v2 4/8] x86, microcode, intel: rename apply_microcode and declare it static Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-25 16:23     ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-23 20:10 ` [PATCH 5/8] x86, microcode, intel: don't use fields from unknown format header Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-24 11:37   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-24 13:30     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-24 14:28       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-24 15:07         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-24 16:29           ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-24 17:49             ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-23 20:10 ` [PATCH 6/8] x86, microcode, intel: total_size is valid only when data_size != 0 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-25 16:46   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-25 19:04     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-28 14:26       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-28 15:39         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [this message]
2014-07-23 20:10 ` [PATCH 7/8] x86, microcode, intel: forbid some incorrect metadata Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-28 15:31   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-28 19:37     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-29 10:45       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-07-29 20:25         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-08-04 11:09           ` Borislav Petkov
2014-08-04 20:18             ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-08-08 12:54               ` Borislav Petkov
2014-08-08 13:50                 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-08-08 15:21                   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-08-08 15:45                     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-23 20:10 ` [PATCH 8/8] x86, microcode, intel: correct extended signature checksum verification Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-07-28 20:36   ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-08-24 14:55 ` [tip:x86/microcode] x86, microcode, amd: Fix missing static declaration tip-bot for Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-08-24 14:55 ` [tip:x86/microcode] x86, microcode, intel: Add missing static declarations tip-bot for Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-08-24 14:56 ` [tip:x86/microcode] x86, microcode, intel: Fix typos tip-bot for Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-08-24 14:56 ` [tip:x86/microcode] x86, microcode, intel: Rename apply_microcode and declare it static tip-bot for Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-08-24 14:56 ` [tip:x86/microcode] x86, microcode, intel: Fix total_size computation tip-bot for Henrique de Moraes Holschuh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140728153905.GB9752@khazad-dum.debian.net \
    --to=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.