From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Masahiro Yamada Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 18:34:07 +0900 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 0/15] Kconfig for U-Boot In-Reply-To: References: <20140730172710.37D7.AA925319@jp.panasonic.com> Message-ID: <20140730183407.5D0C.AA925319@jp.panasonic.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Simon, On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 10:08:53 +0100 Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Masahiro, > > On 30 July 2014 09:27, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > > > > > > > On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 04:43:35 +0100 > > Simon Glass wrote: > >> > >> Also some thoughts for the future: > >> > >> 1. The 'menuconfig' option makes it obvious that we are dealing with > >> U-Boot / SPL / TPL. Can we do the same for 'xconfig'? > > > > > > Sorry, I could not understand what you mean. > > > > In my rough understanding, 'menuconfig' and 'xconfig' are equivalent > > except the appearance of GUI. > > > > What is expactly supported in 'menuconfig' and missing in 'xconfig'? > > At the top with menuconfig it shows U-Boot, or SPL, or TPL so it is > clear which one you are configuring. With xconfig I don't see the same > thing. So when you are configuring SPL it is not clear that you are > not in fact configuring the main U-Boot. Now I understood your question. Thanks. As far as I tested, 'menuconfig' and 'nconfig' show which one is being configured. But I am afraid 'xconfig' and 'gconfig' don't. Anyway, if we type 'make spl/xconfig', it means we are configuring for SPL. It is clear enough, isn't it? Best Regards Masahiro Yamada