From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 13:51:38 +0200 From: Antonio Ospite To: Vikrampal Cc: 'Luiz Augusto von Dentz' , linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, 'Dmitry Kasatkin' Subject: Re: AVCTP and AVRCP packet decoder file structure in btmon Message-Id: <20140805135138.4d27987b16680f617c27582b@ao2.it> In-Reply-To: <002f01cfb07a$2502c170$6f084450$@samsung.com> References: <001301cfafc0$ef11b350$cd3519f0$@samsung.com> <002f01cfb07a$2502c170$6f084450$@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 12:24:44 +0530 Vikrampal wrote: > Sure Luiz! > > However, I've one more small doubt. If I'm submitting a series of patches > Such as 1/4, 2/4, 3/4, 4/4... I guess in such scenarios no need to ensure that > the patches separately compiles. What we need to ensure is that all the patches together > gets compiled properly. Am I mistaken? > Make sure that sub-sequences of a series produce sensible code. The code should $VALIDATE with 1/4 applied. The code should $VALIDATE with 1/4 and 2/4 applied. The code should $VALIDATE with 1/4, 2/4 and 3/4 applied. The code should $VALIDATE with 1/4, 2/4, 3/4 and 4/4 applied. The definition of VALIDATE can vary project by project or feature by feature; the minimum requirement should be that compilation always succeeds. You can use something like: git rebase -i --exec "make" some_parent_branch to test that compilation passes after each commit. Ciao, Antonio -- Antonio Ospite http://ao2.it A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?