Re: [RFC 00/20] perf: Finish sampling commands when events are closed

[Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 05:28:12PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 05:12:49PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Em Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:49:54AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > hi,
> > > adding support to quit sampling commands:
> > >   record,top,trace,kvm stat live
> > > 
> > > when all the monitored events are closed, like following perf
> > > command will now exit when monitored process (pid 1234) exits:
> > > 
> > >   $ perf record -p 1234
> > > 
> > > I added independent poller object to handle basic polling
> > > tasks. I had to factor some parts, so sending this as RFC,
> > 
> > Why? I'm trying to figure out why this poller class is needed, just from
> > reading the changelog entries, no luck so far.
> 
> So this is all about accounting for when all events are closed? I.e. as
> we receive the ERR and HUP we go on closing the entries in the pollfd?
> Then, when none are closed, then we exit, is that the case?
> 
> Why not just mark them -1 and decrement evlist->nr_open_fds (new field)?
> 
> struct pollfds {
> 	struct pollfd *pollfds;
> 	int    nr_fds;
> 	int    nr_open_fds;
> };
> 
> Don't use callbacks and then that poller_item doesn't need to exist :-\

I think callbacks are convenient when having different kind
of events combined in polling, as described in my reply to
your first email

> 
> I'll try to cook a patch with those ideas later today, if for anything,
> to validate your patches :-)

ok ;-) thanks

jirka