From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vinod Koul Subject: Re: Audio mini conference 2014? Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 21:05:37 +0530 Message-ID: <20140812153537.GI13288@intel.com> References: <20140722222038.GW17528@sirena.org.uk> <53CF8306.3090009@zonque.org> <1407312794.2630.1.camel@tkkaskin-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com> <53E1E432.9000707@zonque.org> <53E1F58A.605@zonque.org> <02884A65-7ADE-4FF3-8552-AD8E73862624@cirrus.com> <20140807140957.GI8181@intel.com> <20140812151258.GH13288@intel.com> <53EA34EF.8020205@metafoo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [143.182.124.21]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40FF62650FE for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 17:48:34 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53EA34EF.8020205@metafoo.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Lars-Peter Clausen , Takashi Iwai Cc: "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , Tanu Kaskinen , Paul Handrigan , Mark Brown , David Henningsson , Daniel Mack List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 05:38:23PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > On 08/12/2014 05:12 PM, Vinod Koul wrote: > >On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 10:14:39AM -0500, Paul Handrigan wrote: > >>>>>What date would we prefer? There's an event on Tuesday night (~6pm), but > >>>>>I guess we wouldn't need the room longer than that anyway, right? > >>>>It would be best that it is not during LPC as mentioned before. Will Saturday after LPC work as well? > >>>Plumbers starts Wed.. So tue can work too :) > >>> > >>>Btw should we request a LPC track for backup. > >>> > >>I believe it is too late to request a LPC track. > >Checking the site again, looks like we can still make a request My bad, wrong interpretation. Looks like new uconf are not accepted. Mark, Takashi, can we get some leeway with organizers > >> > >>Tuesday would be good as well. Should we go with that since we may > >>have a place for it? > >I am okay either days. > > > >Btw I didnt hear about the topics... > > > > If there is interest I'll prepare something about ASoC > componentization, what's the status and where it is going. That would be good. I was planning to discuss Dynamic FW, effect API (yet again), more DSP support esp on PCM side -- ~Vinod